Retirement communities, continuing care · Connecticut

The Watermark at 3030 Park

Bridgeport, CT · ~252 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Watermark at 3030 Park runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade C.

The Watermark at 3030 Park: 3.9 TCR = 101% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Watermark at 3030 Park safety composite

The Watermark at 3030 Park scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2024

The Watermark at 3030 Park injury rate improved

The Watermark at 3030 Park's TCR fell 1.1 from 4.0 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.0 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=4.0 · 2024=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Bridgeport, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 101% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #4/43
  • PHOTO Wesley Manor Retirem…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 55 inj
  • SIZE ~252 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wesley Manor Retirement Community (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

The Watermark at 3030 Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Watermark at 3030 Park averages 3.9 TCR (101% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Watermark at 3030 Park TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=4 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 3.8

Where The Watermark at 3030 Park falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 43 Retirement communities, contin employers in Connecticut.

The Watermark at 3030 Park (252 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Watermark at 3030 Park
The Watermark at 3030 Park (252 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Watermark at 3030 Park has more employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 1.8 5 0 0
2023 4.0 3.5 7 0 0
2022 5.5 5.5 9 0 0
2021 1.2 0.0 2 0 0
2020 3.8 3.2 6 0 0
2019 2.8 1.1 5 0 0
2018 3.6 1.2 6 0 0
2017 6.7 1.5 9 0 0
2016 4.0 3.3 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CT · Bridgeport

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 150 employers in Bridgeport, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wesley Manor Retirement Community 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maple Springs Management - Brigham City 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Raymore Senior Care, LLC 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lincolnia Senior Residences 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Advance Mold and Manufacturing 252 FTE
STATE-SIZE RBC Bearings, Aircraft Products, Inc. 252 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Haven Markets LLC dba ShopRite of East Haven 252 FTE
STATE-SIZE ESSEX 252 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bridgeport Hospital 3,332 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Vincent's Medical Center - Bridgeport Campus 2,340 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST VINCENTS MEDICAL CENTER - BRIDGEPORT 2,273 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-CTBRI1 2,079 FTE
NAT-TCR Keefe Ohio 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hendrick Cedar Mall 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Cape Cod Senior Residences 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR LB Water- Selinsgrove 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dan Williams Company 252 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foodservice Powell - 0725 252 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silgan Containers Maxton 252 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hubert North America Service, LLC 252 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.