Residential Intellectual & Developmental Disability Facilties · Florida

Cape Coral Cluster

Cape Coral, FL · ~87 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cape Coral Cluster runs at 250% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Residential Intellectual & Developmental Disability Facilties workplace, earning a grade F.

Cape Coral Cluster: 9.5 TCR = 250% of Residential Intellectual & Developmental Disability Facilties BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cape Coral Cluster safety composite

Cape Coral Cluster scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.4

2016→2024

Cape Coral Cluster injury rate improved

Cape Coral Cluster's TCR fell 8.4 from 13.3 in 2016 to 4.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 21.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.3 · 2017=21.0 · 2018=13.6 · 2019=14.3 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=11.2 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=4.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Cape Coral, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.5 · 250% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #60/92
  • PHOTO Citizen Care
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Citizen Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Cape Coral Cluster in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cape Coral Cluster averages 9.5 TCR (250% of the Residential Intellectual & Developmental Disability Facilties BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cape Coral Cluster TCR series: 2016=13.3 · 2017=21 · 2018=13.6 · 2019=14.3 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=11.2 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=4.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Cape Coral Cluster falls in its industry

2,261 Residential Intellectual & Dev establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #60 safest of 92 Residential Intellectual & Dev employers in Florida.

Cape Coral Cluster (87 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cape Coral Cluster
Cape Coral Cluster (87 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Cape Coral Cluster has more employees than the Residential Intellectual & Developmental median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.9 4.9 3 0 0
2023 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2022 3.6 3.6 2 0 0
2021 11.2 7.4 6 0 0
2020 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 14.3 10.7 8 0 0
2018 13.6 11.7 7 0 0
2017 21.0 15.3 11 0 0
2016 13.3 9.5 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · FL · Cape Coral

2,261 Residential Intellectual & Developmental Disability Facilties employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 116 employers in Cape Coral, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Citizen Care 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Celoron B 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakeside TLF, LLC 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Worc Operations 9.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Potato PH 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbia Care Florida LLC.-Arcadia 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services Lake City 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crystal River Nuclear Plant 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gulf Coast Village 462 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 819 448 FTE
CITY-NEAR 819 416 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gulf Care Inc. 379 FTE
NAT-TCR Festival Foods Andover 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR New Holland Brewing Production Campus 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Designwerkes, Inc. 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Citizen Care 9.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE CMC Sheet Metal Inc. 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE 102-BANDERA 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fareway Stores, Inc. 014 Sergeant Bluff 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fareway Stores, Inc. 049 Papillion 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.