Activated carbon or charcoal manufacturing · California

Carbon Activated Corporation- 250

Compton, CA · ~51 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carbon Activated Corporation- 250 runs at 264% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Activated carbon or charcoal manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Carbon Activated Corporation- 250: 8.7 TCR = 264% of Activated carbon or charcoal manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carbon Activated Corporation- 250 safety composite

Carbon Activated Corporation- 250 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.7

2020→2024

Carbon Activated Corporation- 250 injury rate improved

Carbon Activated Corporation- 250's TCR fell 5.7 from 9.9 in 2020 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 14.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=9.9 · 2021=14.2 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325998 · Compton, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.7 · 264% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #16/18
  • PHOTO Pyrotechnique By Gru…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pyrotechnique By Grucci, Inc (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Carbon Activated Corporation- 250 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carbon Activated Corporation- 250 averages 8.7 TCR (264% of the Activated carbon or charcoal manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carbon Activated Corporation- 250 TCR series: 2020=9.9 · 2021=14.2 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Carbon Activated Corporation- 250 falls in its industry

485 Activated carbon or charcoal m establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 18 Activated carbon or charcoal m employers in California.

Carbon Activated Corporation- 250 (51 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Carbon Activated Corporation- 250
Carbon Activated Corporation- 250 (51 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Carbon Activated Corporation- 250 has fewer employees than the Activated carbon or charcoal manufacturi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2023 6.7 6.7 2 1 0
2022 8.6 2.1 2 2 0
2021 14.2 10.1 7 0 0
2020 9.9 2.0 2 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325998 · CA · Compton

485 Activated carbon or charcoal manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 143 employers in Compton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pyrotechnique By Grucci, Inc 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Repackaging 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR RBP Chemical Technology INC 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kerry - Plant City FL 8.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Robert Young Vineyards 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE H&W Vineyards 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huber Farms Inc 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Brothers Farms Inc 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-017 910 FTE
CITY-NEAR 430-DC006 793 FTE
CITY-NEAR 430-DC001 789 FTE
CITY-NEAR The People Concern - SOLAR 448 FTE
NAT-TCR Peak Delivery Services LLC 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 2315 - Augusta 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 1046 - Germantown 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Troy Clogg Landscape Associates 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Boaen Mechanical 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE 00601 Merwin Hydro Plnt 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marshville Bakery Feeds 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zampell Refractories Inc. Massachusetts Division 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.