Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) manufacturing · North Carolina

Marshville Bakery Feeds

Marshville, NC · ~51 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Marshville Bakery Feeds runs at 122% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Marshville Bakery Feeds: 4.8 TCR = 122% of Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) manufacturing BLS 3.9 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Marshville Bakery Feeds safety composite

Marshville Bakery Feeds scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2020→2024

Marshville Bakery Feeds injury rate improved

Marshville Bakery Feeds's TCR fell 2.2 from 6.7 in 2020 to 4.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=6.7 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311119 · Marshville, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 122% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #23/29
  • PHOTO Pharmgate-Omaha
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pharmgate-Omaha (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Marshville Bakery Feeds in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Marshville Bakery Feeds averages 4.8 TCR (122% of the Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Marshville Bakery Feeds TCR series: 2020=6.7 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=4.5 · BLS 3.9

Where Marshville Bakery Feeds falls in its industry

756 Animal feed mills (except dog establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 29 Animal feed mills (except dog employers in North Carolina.

Marshville Bakery Feeds (51 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Marshville Bakery Feeds
Marshville Bakery Feeds (51 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Marshville Bakery Feeds has more employees than the Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.5 4.5 2 0 0
2023 5.4 3.6 3 0 0
2022 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2021 5.5 1.9 2 1 0
2020 6.7 5.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311119 · NC · Marshville

756 Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 21 employers in Marshville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pharmgate-Omaha 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highland Premix Plant 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quality Liquid Feeds Inc 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sanderson Farms Kinston Feed Mill 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hawksridge Farms, Inc 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Burlington Operations Center 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE DRB Group North Carolina LLC - Charlotte Division 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE All other sites Gastonia 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marshville Plant 709 FTE
CITY-NEAR Edwards Wood Products, Inc. 674 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC Operations 470 FTE
CITY-NEAR Edwards Wood Products - Marshville Plant 331 FTE
NAT-TCR Gristedes #543 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 4114-Moxy Louisville Dt 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Fareway Stores, Inc. 055 Hiawatha 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sugar Rock Corporation d/b/a Shade Systems 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Zampell Refractories Inc. Massachusetts Division 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boaen Mechanical 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waverly Inn 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carbon Activated Corporation- 250 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.