Catalytic converters, engine exhaust, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · Ohio

Cardington Yutaka Technologies, Inc

Cardington, OH · ~731 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cardington Yutaka Technologies, Inc runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Catalytic converters, engine exhaust, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Cardington Yutaka Technologies, Inc: 5.5 TCR = 101% of Catalytic converters, engine exhaust, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cardington Yutaka Technologies, Inc safety composite

Cardington Yutaka Technologies, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2016→2024

Cardington Yutaka Technologies, Inc injury rate improved

Cardington Yutaka Technologies, Inc's TCR fell 4.4 from 7.6 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.6 · 2017=8.9 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336390 · Cardington, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.5 · 101% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #73/91
  • PHOTO DCI Frankfort IN
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 322 inj
  • SIZE ~731 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DCI Frankfort IN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Cardington Yutaka Technologies, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cardington Yutaka Technologies, Inc averages 5.5 TCR (101% of the Catalytic converters, engine exhaust, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cardington Yutaka Technologies, Inc TCR series: 2016=7.6 · 2017=8.9 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 5.4

Where Cardington Yutaka Technologies, Inc falls in its industry

772 Catalytic converters, engine e establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #73 safest of 91 Catalytic converters, engine e employers in Ohio.

Cardington Yutaka Technologies, Inc (731 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cardington Yutaka Technologies, Inc
Cardington Yutaka Technologies, Inc (731 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Cardington Yutaka Technologies, Inc has more employees than the Catalytic converters, engine exhaust, au median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 2.9 14 0 0
2023 4.2 3.3 15 3 0
2022 3.7 2.3 15 1 0
2021 5.1 1.8 18 2 0
2020 5.9 4.0 33 1 0
2019 3.1 2.6 24 1 0
2018 7.4 6.0 59 7 0
2017 8.9 7.1 76 8 0
2016 7.6 6.3 68 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336390 · OH · Cardington

772 Catalytic converters, engine exhaust, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DCI Frankfort IN 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant Eight 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Best Fender Products 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shape Corp - 1900 Hayes 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE O'Bleness Memorial Hospital 731 FTE
STATE-SIZE OH-SPRIN01 732 FTE
STATE-SIZE Victoria's Secret & Company Distribution Center 4 730 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fresh Mark Salem 729 FTE
NAT-TCR Huntington Fire Company #3 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR UBY 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR MEM-ESS 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Northern Light Health Center 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nucor Steel Decatur, LLC. 731 FTE
NAT-SIZE ED 731 FTE
NAT-SIZE Entegris - Chaska 731 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ridgecrest Regional Hospital 731 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.