MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Georgia

Cardiology Associates of Savannah

Savannah, GA · ~38 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cardiology Associates of Savannah runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade B.

Cardiology Associates of Savannah: 2.4 TCR = 64% of MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cardiology Associates of Savannah safety composite

Cardiology Associates of Savannah scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cardiology Associates of Savannah: 0.0 → 7.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 7.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.96× in 2022

Cardiology Associates of Savannah's TCR rose 7.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 7.1 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Savannah, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 64% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #11/37
  • PHOTO GWMFA 2300M
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GWMFA 2300M (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Cardiology Associates of Savannah in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cardiology Associates of Savannah averages 2.4 TCR (64% of the MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cardiology Associates of Savannah TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.7 · 2018=0 · 2022=7.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Cardiology Associates of Savannah falls in its industry

2,836 MDs' (medical doctors, except establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 37 MDs' (medical doctors, except employers in Georgia.

Cardiology Associates of Savannah (38 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Cardiology Associates of Savannah
Cardiology Associates of Savannah (38 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Cardiology Associates of Savannah has fewer employees than the MDs' (medical doctors, except mental hea median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 7.1 2.4 2 1 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.7 0.0 0 1 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · GA · Savannah

2,836 MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 511 employers in Savannah, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GWMFA 2300M 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lowndes Medical Clinic 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR GHE Physicians, P.C. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2428 Merrick Road 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Trico Gin 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rocky Mountain 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant Bartletts Ferry 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant Wallace 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gulfstream Aerospace 13,245 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Health University Medical Center 3,186 FTE
CITY-NEAR Savannah College of Art and Design 2,369 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Health University Medical 2,056 FTE
NAT-TCR Acrylic Design Associates 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR East Central Oklahoma Electric Cooperative 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 1008 - New Philadelphia 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 1068 - Monaca 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Air Components Inc. 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE LindenGrove Communities - Corporate Office 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diana's Mexican Food Restaurant 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE HTI at Gray Court 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.