Displays (e.g., counter, floor, point-of-purchase) manufacturing · Minnesota

Acrylic Design Associates

Plymouth, MN · ~117 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Acrylic Design Associates runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Displays (e.g., counter, floor, point-of-purchase) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Acrylic Design Associates: 2.4 TCR = 74% of Displays (e.g., counter, floor, point-of-purchase) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Acrylic Design Associates safety composite

Acrylic Design Associates scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2017→2022

Acrylic Design Associates injury rate improved

Acrylic Design Associates's TCR fell 2.8 from 4.5 in 2017 to 1.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.5 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=1.7 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339950 · Plymouth, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 74% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #4/12
  • PHOTO Scott AG, LLC
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~117 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Scott AG, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Acrylic Design Associates in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Acrylic Design Associates averages 2.4 TCR (74% of the Displays (e.g., counter, floor, point-of-purchase) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Acrylic Design Associates TCR series: 2017=4.5 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=1.7 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Acrylic Design Associates falls in its industry

405 Displays (e.g., counter, floor establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 12 Displays (e.g., counter, floor employers in Minnesota.

Acrylic Design Associates (117 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Acrylic Design Associates
Acrylic Design Associates (117 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Acrylic Design Associates has more employees than the Displays (e.g., counter, floor, point-of median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.7 1.7 1 1 0
2021 0.9 0.9 0 1 0
2019 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2018 3.4 2.5 4 0 0
2017 4.5 0.9 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339950 · MN · Plymouth

405 Displays (e.g., counter, floor, point-of-purchase) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 321 employers in Plymouth, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Scott AG, LLC 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Innomark Communications- 420 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Splash Events 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Frank Balton & Co., Inc 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE WLS NextEra Analytics St Paul 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gardner Builders 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chard Excavating 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Laketown Electric Corporation 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lawrence Service LLC 3,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR EP SH Plymouth MN 2,084 FTE
CITY-NEAR EP / SH Plymouth MN 1,982 FTE
CITY-NEAR CN Plymouth 1,565 FTE
NAT-TCR Cardiology Associates of Savannah 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR East Central Oklahoma Electric Cooperative 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Karas & Karas Glass Co.,Inc 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 1008 - New Philadelphia 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ortho Clinical Diagnostics CNP 130 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tops #022 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tops #504 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE TarfFix Devices, Inc. Fairfield 117 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.