Cardiologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Florida

Cardiology Partners P.I.

Palm Beach Gardens, FL · ~79 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cardiology Partners P.I. runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cardiologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade A.

Cardiology Partners P.I.: 1.1 TCR = 28% of Cardiologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cardiology Partners P.I. safety composite

Cardiology Partners P.I. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cardiology Partners P.I.: 0.0 → 1.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 2.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Cardiology Partners P.I.'s TCR rose 1.3 from 0.0 in 2018 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Palm Beach Gardens, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #24/76
  • PHOTO Shelby County Jail E…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shelby County Jail East (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Cardiology Partners P.I. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cardiology Partners P.I. averages 1.1 TCR (28% of the Cardiologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cardiology Partners P.I. TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.4 · 2022=1.6 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Cardiology Partners P.I. falls in its industry

2,836 Cardiologists' offices (e.g., establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 76 Cardiologists' offices (e.g., employers in Florida.

Cardiology Partners P.I. (79 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Cardiology Partners P.I.
Cardiology Partners P.I. (79 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Cardiology Partners P.I. has more employees than the Cardiologists' offices (e.g., centers, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2022 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · FL · Palm Beach Gardens

2,836 Cardiologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 77 employers in Palm Beach Gardens, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shelby County Jail East 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABERCROMBIE RADIOLOGY 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Administration 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mercy Specialist Physicians 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wish Farms 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE PSN Plant Sanford 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Englewood Water District 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE RLH Construction 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR 333 PALM BEACH GARDENS MEDICAL CENTER 872 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-333 757 FTE
CITY-NEAR HearUSA 492 FTE
CITY-NEAR Otis Elevator Company- NAA Headquarters Palm Beach Gardens 361 FTE
NAT-TCR Borg Indak, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sky-Rider Equipment Co., Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sealed Air 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Forsyth County Interchange Modification 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenville OB/GYN 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orthopaedic Associates of Reading, Ltd. 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Acme Manufacturing Company 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.