Buffing and polishing machines, metalworking, manufacturing · Michigan

Acme Manufacturing Company

Auburn Hills, MI · ~79 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Acme Manufacturing Company runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Buffing and polishing machines, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Acme Manufacturing Company: 1.3 TCR = 39% of Buffing and polishing machines, metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Acme Manufacturing Company safety composite

Acme Manufacturing Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2018→2024

Acme Manufacturing Company injury rate improved

Acme Manufacturing Company's TCR fell 1.3 from 3.4 in 2018 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.4 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333517 · Auburn Hills, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 39% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #12/58
  • PHOTO Fives Cincinnati
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fives Cincinnati (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Acme Manufacturing Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Acme Manufacturing Company averages 1.3 TCR (39% of the Buffing and polishing machines, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Acme Manufacturing Company TCR series: 2018=3.4 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Acme Manufacturing Company falls in its industry

391 Buffing and polishing machines establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 58 Buffing and polishing machines employers in Michigan.

Acme Manufacturing Company (79 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Acme Manufacturing Company
Acme Manufacturing Company (79 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Acme Manufacturing Company has more employees than the Buffing and polishing machines, metalwor median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 1.1 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 3.4 2.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333517 · MI · Auburn Hills

391 Buffing and polishing machines, metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 215 employers in Auburn Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fives Cincinnati 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ALMCO 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stolle Machinery - Sidney 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR HEM, Inc. - HEMSAW (HEM-Central) 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fontanesi and Kann 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Van Dyken Mechanical 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grapids Home Services 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sharon's Heating & Air Conditioning 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology Center 14,088 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology 12,609 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental - Auburn Hills North 1,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR CTC Pilot Plant 1,094 FTE
NAT-TCR Novastar LP 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR County of Santa Clara Health System, Valley Health Plan (725) 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR JR Engineering 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Certified Fireproofing, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Philip Simmons High School 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenville OB/GYN 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forsyth County Interchange Modification 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cardiology Partners P.I. 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.