Meat products (e.g., hot dogs, luncheon meats, sausages) made from a combination of poultry and other meats · Nebraska

Cargill Protein

Columbus, NE · ~312 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cargill Protein runs at 163% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Meat products (e.g., hot dogs, luncheon meats, sausages) made from a combination of poultry and other meats workplace, earning a grade D.

Cargill Protein: 5.4 TCR = 163% of Meat products (e.g., hot dogs, luncheon meats, sausages) made from a combination of poultry and other meats BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cargill Protein safety composite

Cargill Protein scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cargill Protein: 3.0 → 4.1 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 9.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.51× in 2023

Cargill Protein's TCR rose 1.0 from 3.0 in 2016 to 4.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Columbus, NE ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.4 · 163% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #1/6
  • PHOTO Sanderson Farms Braz…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 88 inj
  • SIZE ~312 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sanderson Farms Brazos Processing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Cargill Protein in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cargill Protein averages 5.4 TCR (163% of the Meat products (e.g., hot dogs, luncheon meats, sausages) made from a combination of poultry and other meats BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cargill Protein TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=6.8 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=9.7 · 2021=5 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=4.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Cargill Protein falls in its industry

509 Meat products (e.g., hot dogs, establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 6 Meat products (e.g., hot dogs, employers in Nebraska.

Cargill Protein (312 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cargill Protein
Cargill Protein (312 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Cargill Protein has fewer employees than the Meat products (e.g., hot dogs, luncheon median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.1 2.7 12 9 0
2022 2.6 2.6 9 2 0
2021 5.0 4.7 12 6 0
2020 9.7 8.9 22 17 0
2019 6.5 5.5 12 15 0
2017 6.8 5.6 19 4 0
2016 3.0 2.3 2 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · NE · Columbus

509 Meat products (e.g., hot dogs, luncheon meats, sausages) made from a combination of poultry and other meats employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 91 employers in Columbus, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sanderson Farms Brazos Processing 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Joe Jurgielewicz & Son LTD 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Natural State Processing 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dothan processing plant 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE JEO Consulting Group, Inc. 312 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gretna - Main Store 311 FTE
STATE-SIZE HG9 313 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hawkins Construction 310 FTE
CITY-NEAR BD Columbus West 1,148 FTE
CITY-NEAR BD Pharmaceutical Systems 971 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbus Community Hospital 833 FTE
CITY-NEAR BD Columbus East 762 FTE
NAT-TCR Legacy Regional transport 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant 2 & 3 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Proform Group Inc 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Whittier Rehabilitation Hospital - Bradford 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bahnson, Inc 312 FTE
NAT-SIZE Il Cmop 312 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richard E. Pierson Construction Co, Inc. 312 FTE
NAT-SIZE Benson's Bakery 312 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.