Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Carlton Senior Living Davis

Davis, CA · ~143 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
29.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carlton Senior Living Davis runs at 787% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Carlton Senior Living Davis: 29.9 TCR = 787% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carlton Senior Living Davis safety composite

Carlton Senior Living Davis scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 29.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 26.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−35.8

2023→2024

Carlton Senior Living Davis injury rate improved

Carlton Senior Living Davis's TCR fell 35.8 from 65.7 in 2023 to 29.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 65.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=65.7 · 2024=29.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Davis, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 29.9 · 787% of ind

  • DART 26.9 DART
  • RANK #635/635
  • PHOTO Cornerstone Residenc…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~143 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cornerstone Residence of Fosston (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Carlton Senior Living Davis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carlton Senior Living Davis averages 29.9 TCR (787% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carlton Senior Living Davis TCR series: 2023=65.7 · 2024=29.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Carlton Senior Living Davis falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #635 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Carlton Senior Living Davis (143 employees, TCR 29.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Carlton Senior Living Davis
Carlton Senior Living Davis (143 employees, TCR 29.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Carlton Senior Living Davis has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 29.9 26.9 15 15 0
2023 65.7 59.4 22 40 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Davis

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 63 employers in Davis, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cornerstone Residence of Fosston 29.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Rose Valley Scappoose 29.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chandler Place Independent Living 29.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCAP Chesterfield Township Opco, LLC d/b/a Commonwealth Senior Living at New Baltimore 29.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE John Kautz Farms 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Deseret Farms of California 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southland Sod Farms Operations, Inc. 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE DuPont Pioneer Woodland WDL1 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis 24,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30290) 714 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Davis Hospital (110-3001) 621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Teichert Construction Woodland 382 FTE
NAT-TCR 287083-Saint Ann Po 29.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Shook Home 29.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZPOR 29.9 TCR
NAT-TCR TenFour Logistics LLC 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Olam Americas LLC 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Canyon State Electric Inc. 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northern Pride, Inc. 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE NIC+ZOE 143 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.