Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Carlton Senior Living SAC Enhanced

Sacramento, CA · ~90 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carlton Senior Living SAC Enhanced runs at 274% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Carlton Senior Living SAC Enhanced: 10.4 TCR = 274% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carlton Senior Living SAC Enhanced safety composite

Carlton Senior Living SAC Enhanced scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Carlton Senior Living SAC Enhanced: 6.8 → 14.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 14.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.01× in 2024

Carlton Senior Living SAC Enhanced's TCR rose 7.2 from 6.8 in 2023 to 14.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.4 · 274% of ind

  • DART 10.5 DART
  • RANK #367/635
  • PHOTO Cornerstone Residenc…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cornerstone Residence Senior Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Carlton Senior Living SAC Enhanced in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carlton Senior Living SAC Enhanced averages 10.4 TCR (274% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carlton Senior Living SAC Enhanced TCR series: 2023=6.8 · 2024=14 · BLS 3.8

Where Carlton Senior Living SAC Enhanced falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #367 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Carlton Senior Living SAC Enhanced (90 employees, TCR 10.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Carlton Senior Living SAC Enhanced
Carlton Senior Living SAC Enhanced (90 employees, TCR 10.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Carlton Senior Living SAC Enhanced has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.0 10.5 5 3 0
2023 6.8 3.4 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Sacramento

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cornerstone Residence Senior Care 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Wellington 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cape Memory Care 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Findlay 10.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE HM Clause - Davis West Research Station 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holland America Flowers, LLC 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hettinga - California 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE A & R Contracting 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Aero Heating & Ventilating 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR StoryPoint Saline 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Dallas,TX - 439 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sewer Plant 10.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Elmwood Ave 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE BHN 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fordham Bedford Renewal Inc. 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orion Pax 90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.