Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Minnesota

Cornerstone Residence Senior Care

Bagley, MN · ~31 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cornerstone Residence Senior Care runs at 274% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Cornerstone Residence Senior Care: 10.4 TCR = 274% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cornerstone Residence Senior Care safety composite

Cornerstone Residence Senior Care scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cornerstone Residence Senior Care: 5.6 → 11.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 82.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.13× in 2024

Cornerstone Residence Senior Care's TCR rose 6.2 from 5.6 in 2017 to 11.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 82.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Bagley, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.4 · 274% of ind

  • DART 11.7 DART
  • RANK #180/240
  • PHOTO The Wellington
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Wellington (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Cornerstone Residence Senior Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cornerstone Residence Senior Care averages 10.4 TCR (274% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cornerstone Residence Senior Care TCR series: 2017=5.6 · 2018=10.7 · 2020=82.6 · 2022=6 · 2023=18 · 2024=11.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Cornerstone Residence Senior Care falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #180 safest of 240 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Cornerstone Residence Senior Care (31 employees, TCR 10.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cornerstone Residence Senior Care
Cornerstone Residence Senior Care (31 employees, TCR 10.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Cornerstone Residence Senior Care has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.7 11.7 2 0 0
2023 18.0 18.0 0 3 0
2022 6.0 6.0 1 0 0
2020 82.6 77.7 3 14 0
2018 10.7 5.3 2 0 0
2017 5.6 5.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Bagley

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 15 employers in Bagley, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Wellington 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carlton Senior Living SAC Enhanced 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cape Memory Care 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Findlay 10.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE High Island Dairy 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Protein Sources, LLP 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Black Dog Gen Plant-UC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Power Plant 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR TEAM Industries Bagley 380 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISD #162 - Elementary 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISD #162 Bagley Elementary School 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISD #162 - High School 83 FTE
NAT-TCR AATP - Mid Atlantic 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Shaffers Bottled Gas, Inc 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Lindsay 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Citizens Care & Rehabilitation Center 10.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE SpringHill Suites by Marriott Seattle Issaquah 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ross SFS 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Bay Sanitary District 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wakou USA Hq 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.