Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Carlton Senior Living San Jose

San Jose, CA · ~134 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carlton Senior Living San Jose runs at 162% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Carlton Senior Living San Jose: 6.2 TCR = 162% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carlton Senior Living San Jose safety composite

Carlton Senior Living San Jose scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2023→2024

Carlton Senior Living San Jose injury rate improved

Carlton Senior Living San Jose's TCR fell 2.7 from 7.5 in 2023 to 4.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 7.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=7.5 · 2024=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · San Jose, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 162% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #148/635
  • PHOTO Wexford House
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~134 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wexford House (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Carlton Senior Living San Jose in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carlton Senior Living San Jose averages 6.2 TCR (162% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carlton Senior Living San Jose TCR series: 2023=7.5 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Carlton Senior Living San Jose falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #148 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Carlton Senior Living San Jose (134 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Carlton Senior Living San Jose
Carlton Senior Living San Jose (134 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Carlton Senior Living San Jose has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 1.9 3 2 0
2023 7.5 7.5 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · San Jose

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wexford House 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale East Mesa 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riverview Village Senior Living 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR EB CARE/ The Bristal at Massapequa 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE ag land inc 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Capstone Ranch 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nissen Vineyard Services Inc. 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE H & C Ag, Inc. 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE 11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics) 7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosendin - Main 6,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics) 6,576 FTE
NAT-TCR Services Plus, Inc. 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Southeastern Motor Freight, Inc. 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 096 Lci 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Huntsville Health and Rehabilitation, LLC 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Westminster Palms 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Parallel Forest Products 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Usc - Hammonton 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allstate Beverage Company 134 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.