Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Carmel Village at Clovis Assisted Living

Clovis, CA · ~69 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carmel Village at Clovis Assisted Living runs at 265% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Carmel Village at Clovis Assisted Living: 10.1 TCR = 265% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carmel Village at Clovis Assisted Living safety composite

Carmel Village at Clovis Assisted Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.2

2016→2018

Carmel Village at Clovis Assisted Living injury rate improved

Carmel Village at Clovis Assisted Living's TCR fell 15.2 from 19.3 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 19.3 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=19.3 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Clovis, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.1 · 265% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #356/635
  • PHOTO Juniper House
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Juniper House (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Carmel Village at Clovis Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carmel Village at Clovis Assisted Living averages 10.1 TCR (265% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carmel Village at Clovis Assisted Living TCR series: 2016=19.3 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=4.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Carmel Village at Clovis Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #356 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Carmel Village at Clovis Assisted Living (69 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Carmel Village at Clovis Assisted Living
Carmel Village at Clovis Assisted Living (69 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Carmel Village at Clovis Assisted Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2017 6.7 6.7 3 0 0
2016 19.3 11.1 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Clovis

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 125 employers in Clovis, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Juniper House 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR FM Las Vegas Care Properties, LLC 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale West Ashley 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Paddock Hills 10.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Woolf Enterprises 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terranova Ranch, Inc 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rayo Shop 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Harvesting | Citrus Harvesting 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clovis Community Medical Ctr 2,643 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alorica - Clovis 687 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Clovis 668 FTE
CITY-NEAR Enhanced Landscape Management 510 FTE
NAT-TCR Hatfield BROSCO 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 578 ABC Supply Co., inc. 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR TransPak- Tualatin 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Kalispell (Mtkal) 10.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cobalt Rehabilitation Hospital 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shopko Store #14 (Beaver Dam, WI) 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shopko Store #26 (Beloit, WI) 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shopko Store #5 (Depere, WI) 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.