Food Service · Pennsylvania

Carnegie Mellon University Tepper Quad (Pitts

Pittsburgh, PA · ~23 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.1
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carnegie Mellon University Tepper Quad (Pitts runs at 704% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Food Service workplace, earning a grade F.

Carnegie Mellon University Tepper Quad (Pitts: 21.1 TCR = 704% of Food Service BLS 3.0 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carnegie Mellon University Tepper Quad (Pitts safety composite

Carnegie Mellon University Tepper Quad (Pitts scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Carnegie Mellon University Tepper Quad (Pitts: 18.0 → 24.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 24.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.57× in 2019

Carnegie Mellon University Tepper Quad (Pitts's TCR rose 6.3 from 18.0 in 2018 to 24.3 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Pittsburgh, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 21.1 · 704% of ind

  • DART 12.1 DART
  • RANK #457/463
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT UNIV AT AL…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT UNIV AT ALBANY COLONIAL QUAD (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Carnegie Mellon University Tepper Quad (Pitts in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carnegie Mellon University Tepper Quad (Pitts averages 21.1 TCR (704% of the Food Service BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carnegie Mellon University Tepper Quad (Pitts TCR series: 2018=18 · 2019=24.3 · BLS 3.0

Where Carnegie Mellon University Tepper Quad (Pitts falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #457 safest of 463 Food Service employers in Pennsylvania.

Carnegie Mellon University Tepper Quad (Pitts (23 employees, TCR 21.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Carnegie Mellon University Tepper Quad (Pitts
Carnegie Mellon University Tepper Quad (Pitts (23 employees, TCR 21.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Carnegie Mellon University Tepper Quad (Pitts has fewer employees than the Food Service median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 24.3 12.1 4 0 0
2018 18.0 18.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · PA · Pittsburgh

6,952 Food Service employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT UNIV AT ALBANY COLONIAL QUAD 21.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 000018520 SOUTH PLAINFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT 21.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cartwright 21.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legends - Darien Lake PAC 21.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mt. Parnell Fisheries Co. 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hickory Run Energy, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE CPV Fairview LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valley Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. - Corporate Office 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Saint Paul Police Eastern District 21.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-ABS-0029-0028-01569 21.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Optimal Delivery @ Altitude LLC 21.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Trig's Minocqua 21.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marietta City School District (Park) 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE FDD SOCAL North - Highland - DTI 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zimmer-Biomet North (Warsaw) 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior Plumbing & Heating 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.