Artificially carbonated waters manufacturing · Texas

Carolina Beverage Group Fort Worth North Beach

Roanoke, TX · ~46 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carolina Beverage Group Fort Worth North Beach runs at 221% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Artificially carbonated waters manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Carolina Beverage Group Fort Worth North Beach: 7.3 TCR = 221% of Artificially carbonated waters manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carolina Beverage Group Fort Worth North Beach safety composite

Carolina Beverage Group Fort Worth North Beach scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Carolina Beverage Group Fort Worth North Beach: 3.6 → 11.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 11.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.75× in 2024

Carolina Beverage Group Fort Worth North Beach's TCR rose 7.4 from 3.6 in 2023 to 11.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 312111 · Roanoke, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.3 · 221% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #31/32
  • PHOTO Swire Coca-Cola of K…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Swire Coca-Cola of Kingman (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Carolina Beverage Group Fort Worth North Beach in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carolina Beverage Group Fort Worth North Beach averages 7.3 TCR (221% of the Artificially carbonated waters manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carolina Beverage Group Fort Worth North Beach TCR series: 2023=3.6 · 2024=11 · BLS 3.3

Where Carolina Beverage Group Fort Worth North Beach falls in its industry

516 Artificially carbonated waters establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 32 Artificially carbonated waters employers in Texas.

Carolina Beverage Group Fort Worth North Beach (46 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 149 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Carolina Beverage Group Fort Worth North Beach
Carolina Beverage Group Fort Worth North Beach (46 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 149 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Carolina Beverage Group Fort Worth North Beach has fewer employees than the Artificially carbonated waters manufactu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.0 5.5 4 0 0
2023 3.6 3.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

312111 · TX · Roanoke

516 Artificially carbonated waters manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 70 employers in Roanoke, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Swire Coca-Cola of Kingman 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Louis 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Home Juice Company Memphis 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nor-Cal Beverage Co, Inc. 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coolwater 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE HALE CENTER FEED YARD 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wrangler Feedyard 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE SPG TEXAS COMPLEX -EST 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8027688-Callaway Golf 694 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oscar Renda Contracting Inc.-Company Wide 680 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oscar Renda Contracting, Inc. 642 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8027688 Callaway Golf 640 FTE
NAT-TCR Flmis - Miami South 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Fairfax Operator LLC 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Terra Tec Landscapes Inc 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Macedonia 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vernon Woods Retirement Community 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE FV Clinics-Rosemount 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE HTI 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE EB Nine Mile Creek 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.