Construction management, power and communication transmission line · North Carolina

Carolina Conduit Systems, Inc

Clayton, NC · ~95 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carolina Conduit Systems, Inc runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction management, power and communication transmission line workplace, earning a grade A.

Carolina Conduit Systems, Inc: 0.6 TCR = 21% of Construction management, power and communication transmission line BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carolina Conduit Systems, Inc safety composite

Carolina Conduit Systems, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Carolina Conduit Systems, Inc: 0.0 → 1.4 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 1.5 TCR · DART/TCR 2.38× in 2021

Carolina Conduit Systems, Inc's TCR rose 1.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 2.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Clayton, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 21% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #10/79
  • PHOTO Sky Climber Staffing…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sky Climber Staffing Solutions, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Carolina Conduit Systems, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carolina Conduit Systems, Inc averages 0.6 TCR (21% of the Construction management, power and communication transmission line BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carolina Conduit Systems, Inc TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.5 · 2021=1.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Carolina Conduit Systems, Inc falls in its industry

1,605 Construction management, power establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 79 Construction management, power employers in North Carolina.

Carolina Conduit Systems, Inc (95 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Carolina Conduit Systems, Inc
Carolina Conduit Systems, Inc (95 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Carolina Conduit Systems, Inc has more employees than the Construction management, power and commu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.4 1.4 2 0 0
2019 1.5 0.0 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · NC · Clayton

1,605 Construction management, power and communication transmission line employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 77 employers in Clayton, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sky Climber Staffing Solutions, LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant City Service Area 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valiant Energy Service, LLC. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Linetec Services LLC - South Central Distribution 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Circle S Ranch NC 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raleigh North Transmission and Distribution Operations Center 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE MB Haynes Corporation (Office) 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pyramid Masonry Contractors, NC 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR GRIFOLS THERAPEUTICS LLC (CLAYTON) 1,587 FTE
CITY-NEAR DFP Clayton 808 FTE
CITY-NEAR LSAM DAPI-US 664 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical Industries, LP 644 FTE
NAT-TCR Steel Industries - Plant 3 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Arizona 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR East Long Meadow FS (GTS, HTSG) 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Interport Road Warehouse 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Drury Plaza Hotel - San Antonio Riverwalk 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Costa View Farms 2 (Madera) 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE 49771b - Albuquerque Dc 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE 49491b - Murrieta Zone 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.