Skilled nursing facilities · North Carolina

Southwood Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Clinton, NC · ~95 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
30.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southwood Nursing & Rehabilitation Center runs at 468% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Southwood Nursing & Rehabilitation Center: 30.4 TCR = 468% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southwood Nursing & Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Southwood Nursing & Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 16% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

6/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 30.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−38.1

2020→2021

Southwood Nursing & Rehabilitation Center injury rate improved

Southwood Nursing & Rehabilitation Center's TCR fell 38.1 from 49.4 in 2020 to 11.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 49.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=49.4 · 2021=11.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Clinton, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 30.4 · 468% of ind

  • DART 9.7 DART
  • RANK #510/510
  • PHOTO Andover Manor Rehab …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Andover Manor Rehab and Nursing (0.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Southwood Nursing & Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southwood Nursing & Rehabilitation Center averages 30.4 TCR (468% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Southwood Nursing & Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2020=49.4 · 2021=11.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Southwood Nursing & Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #510 safest of 510 Skilled nursing facilities employers in North Carolina.

Southwood Nursing & Rehabilitation Center (95 employees, TCR 30.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Southwood Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
Southwood Nursing & Rehabilitation Center (95 employees, TCR 30.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Southwood Nursing & Rehabilitation Center has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 11.4 9.7 7 0 0
2020 49.4 41.6 6 32 1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NC · Clinton

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 42 employers in Clinton, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Andover Manor Rehab and Nursing 30.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Shook Home 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 226_338 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9288-752 29.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE OAK GROVE HEALT CARE 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Peak Resources-Pinelake 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2U2Day Logistics LLC 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Renaissance Hotel Operating 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prestage Farms Inc. 786 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Sampson 603 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sampson Reginal Medical Center 522 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2580 293 FTE
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 048 Juvenile Detention Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemper Moving Systems 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kane Warehousing, Inc., GA 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saybrook Landing Health and Rehabilitation 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Express One Logistics, Inc. 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE ViaQuest Residential Services - Akron 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.