Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · South Carolina

Carolina Gardens at Conway

Conway, SC · ~42 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carolina Gardens at Conway runs at 424% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Carolina Gardens at Conway: 16.1 TCR = 424% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carolina Gardens at Conway safety composite

Carolina Gardens at Conway scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−31.5

2020→2022

Carolina Gardens at Conway injury rate improved

Carolina Gardens at Conway's TCR fell 31.5 from 36.3 in 2020 to 4.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 36.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=36.3 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Conway, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.1 · 424% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #96/107
  • PHOTO Park at Laguna Springs
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Park at Laguna Springs (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Carolina Gardens at Conway in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carolina Gardens at Conway averages 16.1 TCR (424% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carolina Gardens at Conway TCR series: 2020=36.3 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=4.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Carolina Gardens at Conway falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #96 safest of 107 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in South Carolina.

Carolina Gardens at Conway (42 employees, TCR 16.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Carolina Gardens at Conway
Carolina Gardens at Conway (42 employees, TCR 16.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Carolina Gardens at Conway has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.8 4.8 2 0 0
2021 7.2 4.8 3 0 0
2020 36.3 36.3 0 17 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · SC · Conway

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 107 employers in Conway, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Park at Laguna Springs 16.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kindred Place at Annville 16.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Regency Palms Long Beach 16.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR B-X Hamden LLC 16.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Titan Production Company, LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newberry Electric Cooperative,Inc. 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spartanburg Resource Center PNG 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE DRB Group South Carolina, LLC- Charleston Division 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Horry County Government 2,603 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coastal Carolina University 2,364 FTE
CITY-NEAR Conway Medical Center 1,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmetto Corp of Conway 662 FTE
NAT-TCR 6962-ABS-0029-0028-01360 16.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 990 Savnannah DC 16.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodmont Real Estate Services 16.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Henry Schein - NYLNG 16.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE ThayerMahan, Inc. 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE 248330-Wakefield Po 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE BMS CAT of Georgia, LLC 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE 084794-New Milford Po 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.