Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing · South Carolina

Champion Window of Columbia

Columbia, SC · ~42 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
20.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Champion Window of Columbia runs at 616% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Champion Window of Columbia: 20.3 TCR = 616% of Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Champion Window of Columbia safety composite

Champion Window of Columbia scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 20.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Champion Window of Columbia: 19.8 → 20.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 20.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.51× in 2024

Champion Window of Columbia's TCR rose 1.1 from 19.8 in 2023 to 20.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326121 · Columbia, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 20.3 · 616% of ind

  • DART 10.5 DART
  • RANK #11/11
  • PHOTO UMR Board Production…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: UMR Board Productions LLC (2.5 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Champion Window of Columbia in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Champion Window of Columbia averages 20.3 TCR (616% of the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Champion Window of Columbia TCR series: 2023=19.8 · 2024=20.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Champion Window of Columbia falls in its industry

202 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 11 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub employers in South Carolina.

Champion Window of Columbia (42 employees, TCR 20.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Champion Window of Columbia
Champion Window of Columbia (42 employees, TCR 20.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Champion Window of Columbia has fewer employees than the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrig median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 20.9 10.5 6 0 0
2023 19.8 8.5 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326121 · SC · Columbia

202 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 542 employers in Columbia, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR UMR Board Productions LLC 17.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR FINGER LAKES EXTRUSION 17.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CE North 15.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Champion Window of Minneapolis 27.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Titan Production Company, LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newberry Electric Cooperative,Inc. 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spartanburg Resource Center PNG 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE DRB Group South Carolina, LLC- Charleston Division 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmetto Health Richland 5,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prisma Health Richland 4,729 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Carolina Department of Transportation 4,400 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC Department of Transportation 3,864 FTE
NAT-TCR Express Transit LLC 20.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Geer Village 20.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Jones & Roberts Co 20.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Life Care Center of Idaho Falls 20.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Everbrite - Elkhorn 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Construction 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Symphony at Valley Farms 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nyck-90-New York, Ny - Kastle 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.