Fabricated plate work manufacturing · South Carolina

Carolina Integrated Solutions, Inc.

Spartanburg, SC · ~21 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carolina Integrated Solutions, Inc. runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fabricated plate work manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Carolina Integrated Solutions, Inc.: 2.3 TCR = 68% of Fabricated plate work manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carolina Integrated Solutions, Inc. safety composite

Carolina Integrated Solutions, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Carolina Integrated Solutions, Inc.: 0.0 → 2.9 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 5.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.29× in 2024

Carolina Integrated Solutions, Inc.'s TCR rose 2.9 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332313 · Spartanburg, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 68% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Mid-Ohio Products, I…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mid-Ohio Products, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Carolina Integrated Solutions, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carolina Integrated Solutions, Inc. averages 2.3 TCR (68% of the Fabricated plate work manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carolina Integrated Solutions, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Carolina Integrated Solutions, Inc. falls in its industry

449 Fabricated plate work manufact establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Fabricated plate work manufact employers in South Carolina.

Carolina Integrated Solutions, Inc. (21 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Carolina Integrated Solutions, Inc.
Carolina Integrated Solutions, Inc. (21 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Carolina Integrated Solutions, Inc. has fewer employees than the Fabricated plate work manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 5.2 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332313 · SC · Spartanburg

449 Fabricated plate work manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 294 employers in Spartanburg, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mid-Ohio Products, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kapco Inc. - Cheyenne 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Farmers Alloy Fabricationg, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PTL Fabricators 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jocassee Hydro 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE BEC - Awendaw Facility 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anderson Regional Joint Water System 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cely Construction Company, Inc. 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR SPARTANBURG FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spartanburg Medical Center 5,386 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spartanburg County 1,633 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spartanburg County Government 1,561 FTE
NAT-TCR IMH Group 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR GA219 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR McClure Company 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Young Touchstone - Lexington Facility 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE J. Trockman & Sons, Inc. 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caravan Packaging, Inc. 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mustang Coatings, LLC. 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anderson Electric, Inc. / Bloomington Branch 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.