Central heating equipment, warm-air, merchant wholesalers · Michigan

Carrier Great Lakes

Livonia, MI · ~104 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carrier Great Lakes runs at 158% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Central heating equipment, warm-air, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

Carrier Great Lakes: 3.5 TCR = 158% of Central heating equipment, warm-air, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carrier Great Lakes safety composite

Carrier Great Lakes scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2024

Carrier Great Lakes injury rate improved

Carrier Great Lakes's TCR fell 2.0 from 3.2 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.2 · 2017=1.0 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=6.5 · 2022=5.0 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423730 · Livonia, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.5 · 158% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #14/23
  • PHOTO Blevins 08 Jacksonvi…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Blevins 08 Jacksonville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Carrier Great Lakes in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carrier Great Lakes averages 3.5 TCR (158% of the Central heating equipment, warm-air, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carrier Great Lakes TCR series: 2016=3.2 · 2017=1 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=6.5 · 2022=5 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 2.2

Where Carrier Great Lakes falls in its industry

290 Central heating equipment, war establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 23 Central heating equipment, war employers in Michigan.

Carrier Great Lakes (104 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Carrier Great Lakes
Carrier Great Lakes (104 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Carrier Great Lakes has more employees than the Central heating equipment, warm-air, mer median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2022 5.0 1.7 6 0 0
2021 6.5 1.9 7 0 0
2020 4.2 4.2 5 0 0
2019 2.8 0.9 3 0 0
2018 3.8 0.9 4 0 0
2017 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2016 3.2 2.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423730 · MI · Livonia

290 Central heating equipment, warm-air, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 282 employers in Livonia, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Blevins 08 Jacksonville 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR DC101 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Johnstone Supply SO1-370 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4192-00051423-SAJ 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Superior Asphalt, Inc. 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Diama-Shield, LLC 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Electrical Contractors, Inc 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Opus Packaging - Jackson 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR System Office - Livonia 6,768 FTE
CITY-NEAR Livonia Transmission Plant 3,122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Livonia Transmission 2,968 FTE
CITY-NEAR Acro Service 2,701 FTE
NAT-TCR 61 Morgan Services Dayton 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 074 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR AdventHealth Lake Placid 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Menasha Packaging Company - Latrobe 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Innospec Active Chemicals, Salisbury 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pocket Nurse Enterprises, LLC 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Capitol Woodworks LLC 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE G-CNY Group LLC 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.