Electric power distribution systems · Arizona

Casa Grande Service Center

Casa Grande, AZ · ~38 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Casa Grande Service Center runs at 124% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric power distribution systems workplace, earning a grade D.

Casa Grande Service Center: 1.5 TCR = 124% of Electric power distribution systems BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Casa Grande Service Center safety composite

Casa Grande Service Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Casa Grande Service Center held a steady TCR band

Casa Grande Service Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Casa Grande, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.5 · 124% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/52
  • PHOTO Engineering / Operat…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Engineering / Operations (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Casa Grande Service Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Casa Grande Service Center averages 1.5 TCR (124% of the Electric power distribution systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Casa Grande Service Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Casa Grande Service Center falls in its industry

2,958 Electric power distribution sy establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 52 Electric power distribution sy employers in Arizona.

Casa Grande Service Center (38 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Casa Grande Service Center
Casa Grande Service Center (38 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Casa Grande Service Center has fewer employees than the Electric power distribution systems median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.3 3.3 0 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2017 4.7 2.3 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · AZ · Casa Grande

2,958 Electric power distribution systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 123 employers in Casa Grande, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Engineering / Operations 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hutchinson Service Center 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Myrtle Beach Service Center/ Technical Services 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Neese District - Jackson EMC 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southern 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eloy, AZ 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Office 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Energy Resources H300 - Electric Distribution 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lucid Motors AMP-1 1,803 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 7013 908 FTE
CITY-NEAR 7013 828 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tractor Supply Company Distribution Center 0111 515 FTE
NAT-TCR B&P Littleford LLC 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR TSI Commercial Floor Covering 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Arc3 Gases, Corporate Operations 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR ThedaCare Physicians New London 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Incubator-Sanger CA 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Precision Iceblast Corporation Headquarters 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ryerson - Kansas City 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal Corp - Cleveland-010 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.