Inedible products (e.g., hides, skins, pulled wool, wool grease) produced in slaughtering plants · California

Incubator-Sanger CA

Sanger, CA · ~38 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Incubator-Sanger CA runs at 174% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Inedible products (e.g., hides, skins, pulled wool, wool grease) produced in slaughtering plants workplace, earning a grade D.

Incubator-Sanger CA: 5.7 TCR = 174% of Inedible products (e.g., hides, skins, pulled wool, wool grease) produced in slaughtering plants BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Incubator-Sanger CA safety composite

Incubator-Sanger CA scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2017→2022

Incubator-Sanger CA injury rate improved

Incubator-Sanger CA's TCR fell 1.5 from 15.6 in 2017 to 14.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 15.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 2.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=15.6 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=14.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311611 · Sanger, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 174% of ind

  • DART 14.1 DART
  • RANK #7/14
  • PHOTO 259
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 259 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Incubator-Sanger CA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Incubator-Sanger CA averages 5.7 TCR (174% of the Inedible products (e.g., hides, skins, pulled wool, wool grease) produced in slaughtering plants BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Incubator-Sanger CA TCR series: 2017=15.6 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=14.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Incubator-Sanger CA falls in its industry

212 Inedible products (e.g., hides establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 14 Inedible products (e.g., hides employers in California.

Incubator-Sanger CA (38 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 297 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Incubator-Sanger CA
Incubator-Sanger CA (38 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 297 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Incubator-Sanger CA has fewer employees than the Inedible products (e.g., hides, skins, p median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 14.1 14.1 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.8 0.0 0 1 0
2018 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2017 15.6 15.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311611 · CA · Sanger

212 Inedible products (e.g., hides, skins, pulled wool, wool grease) produced in slaughtering plants employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 46 employers in Sanger, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 259 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Newbern Plant 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mountain States Rosen New York 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABF Packing LTD 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O SHIPPING 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE GAR & S Farm Labor Services, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supreme Almonds of California, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bays Ranch Inc 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fruit Harvest Family, Inc. 4,103 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fruit Harvest No 2 Inc 1,433 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sanger Plant 1,425 FTE
CITY-NEAR EVERARDO GONZALEZ 866 FTE
NAT-TCR Property & Facilities 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR RIC-ODFL 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbia Boiler Company 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage Healthcare of Hammond 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Casa Grande Service Center 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ryerson - Kansas City 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal Corp - Cleveland-010 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alphagraphics #4 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.