Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Minnesota

Cascade Creek Memory Care

Rochester, MN · ~44 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cascade Creek Memory Care runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Cascade Creek Memory Care: 4.1 TCR = 108% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cascade Creek Memory Care safety composite

Cascade Creek Memory Care scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 4.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cascade Creek Memory Care: 0.0 → 4.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 7.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.08× in 2024

Cascade Creek Memory Care's TCR rose 4.4 from 0.0 in 2022 to 4.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 7.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Rochester, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.1 · 108% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK #64/240
  • PHOTO Harbor Place at Port…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Harbor Place at Port St Lucie (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Cascade Creek Memory Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cascade Creek Memory Care averages 4.1 TCR (108% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cascade Creek Memory Care TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=7.8 · 2024=4.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Cascade Creek Memory Care falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #64 safest of 240 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Cascade Creek Memory Care (44 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cascade Creek Memory Care
Cascade Creek Memory Care (44 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Cascade Creek Memory Care has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.4 4.4 1 0 0
2023 7.8 2.6 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Rochester

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 290 employers in Rochester, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Harbor Place at Port St Lucie 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-62021 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rancho Penasquitos 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hunter's Pointe 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE West River 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monticello Training Ctr-LL 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water Treatment Facility 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE WasteWater Treatment Facility 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Rochester 38,233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Olmsted County 1,304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Collaborative Services, LLC 1,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS 823 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DDC2 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR TNG Worldwide, Inc. 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Vista Knoll Specialized Care 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR NSWC Corona 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tacoma Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Car Wash 8101 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Specialized Construction Inc 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dfa Distributing North - Batavia Il 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.