Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Washington

Cascade Valley Senior Living

Arlington, WA · ~47 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cascade Valley Senior Living runs at 235% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Cascade Valley Senior Living: 8.9 TCR = 235% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cascade Valley Senior Living safety composite

Cascade Valley Senior Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Cascade Valley Senior Living held a steady TCR band

Cascade Valley Senior Living's TCR held near 0.3 from 3.0 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 23.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=7.1 · 2020=14.3 · 2021=23.1 · 2022=7.8 · 2023=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Arlington, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.9 · 235% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #55/109
  • PHOTO Rose Senior Living C…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rose Senior Living Carmel (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Cascade Valley Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cascade Valley Senior Living averages 8.9 TCR (235% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cascade Valley Senior Living TCR series: 2016=3 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=7.1 · 2020=14.3 · 2021=23.1 · 2022=7.8 · 2023=2.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Cascade Valley Senior Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #55 safest of 109 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Cascade Valley Senior Living (47 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cascade Valley Senior Living
Cascade Valley Senior Living (47 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Cascade Valley Senior Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2022 7.8 5.2 3 0 0
2021 23.1 23.1 2 1 0
2020 14.3 14.3 5 1 0
2019 7.1 7.1 3 0 0
2018 4.6 4.6 2 0 0
2016 3.0 3.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · WA · Arlington

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 58 employers in Arlington, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rose Senior Living Carmel 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westwood Ridge II 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vista Del Monte 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Lakeside Village 8.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Longview ST. Helens 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stemilt Ag Services (Administration) 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE RAH Washington Division Office/Home Gallery 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE IMAC Inc 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - PAE2 2,265 FTE
CITY-NEAR Angel of the Winds Casino Resort 649 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3757 325 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3757 300 FTE
NAT-TCR New Bern Riverbend ICF 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 2021 - Ukiah 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR First Choice Ingredients 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Location 4 / EP 8.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Melrose Gallery 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Town East Heating and Air Conditioning Co., LLC 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Frock Bros.Trucking Inc. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Newark Natural Foods 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.