Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Washington

Cascadian Place

Everett, WA · ~29 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cascadian Place runs at 170% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Cascadian Place: 6.5 TCR = 170% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cascadian Place safety composite

Cascadian Place scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.0

2017→2022

Cascadian Place injury rate improved

Cascadian Place's TCR fell 11.0 from 11.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 17.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.0 · 2018=5.0 · 2019=17.5 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Everett, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.5 · 170% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #69/216
  • PHOTO Ventana Winds LLC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ventana Winds LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Cascadian Place in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cascadian Place averages 6.5 TCR (170% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cascadian Place TCR series: 2017=11 · 2018=5 · 2019=17.5 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Cascadian Place falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #69 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Cascadian Place (29 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cascadian Place
Cascadian Place (29 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Cascadian Place has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 17.5 5.8 3 0 0
2018 5.0 0.0 1 0 0
2017 11.0 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WA · Everett

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 271 employers in Everett, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ventana Winds LLC 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wickshire Creeks Crossing 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ohio Living - Greater Cleveland 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10441 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Griffin Creek Farm 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE DG ORCHARDS LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frenchman Hills 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Consolidated Fruit, LLC 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA004 31,034 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA660 EVERETT MEDICAL CTR COLBY-EVERETT HR 3,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR Snohomish County Government 3,004 FTE
CITY-NEAR Snohomish County 2,851 FTE
NAT-TCR Office Pride 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Wilmac Lancashire Hall 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR P14 - Keystone 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Aved Electronics 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Carmel Place 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mansfield 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bear Canyon Estates 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Asbury of Kankakee 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.