Cabinets, wood office-type, freestanding, manufacturing · Michigan

Case Systems, Inc.

Midland, MI · ~170 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Case Systems, Inc. runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cabinets, wood office-type, freestanding, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Case Systems, Inc.: 3.0 TCR = 92% of Cabinets, wood office-type, freestanding, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Case Systems, Inc. safety composite

Case Systems, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2016→2024

Case Systems, Inc. injury rate improved

Case Systems, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.8 from 6.9 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.9 · 2017=5.7 · 2018=4.0 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 337211 · Midland, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 92% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #14/25
  • PHOTO Nucraft Furniture
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 47 inj
  • SIZE ~170 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nucraft Furniture (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Case Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Case Systems, Inc. averages 3.0 TCR (92% of the Cabinets, wood office-type, freestanding, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Case Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2016=6.9 · 2017=5.7 · 2018=4 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Case Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

137 Cabinets, wood office-type, fr establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 25 Cabinets, wood office-type, fr employers in Michigan.

Case Systems, Inc. (170 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 105 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Case Systems, Inc.
Case Systems, Inc. (170 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 105 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Case Systems, Inc. has more employees than the Cabinets, wood office-type, freestanding median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 2.1 6 0 0
2023 3.3 0.0 6 0 0
2022 1.6 1.0 3 0 0
2021 1.9 0.6 3 0 0
2020 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 4.0 3.0 8 0 0
2017 5.7 1.0 6 5 0
2016 6.9 4.8 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

337211 · MI · Midland

137 Cabinets, wood office-type, freestanding, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 135 employers in Midland, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nucraft Furniture 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ICW Acquisition 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Davis Furn Inds. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Innovant Inc 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE JH Campbell 1&2 170 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plastic Trends 170 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cullman 170 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3787_7206 170 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michigan Operations - Midland 3,755 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dow Chemical - Great Lakes Bay Region Corporate Facilities 3,454 FTE
CITY-NEAR MyMichigan Medical Center Midland 2,965 FTE
CITY-NEAR MidMichigan Medical Center - Midland 2,348 FTE
NAT-TCR Lahey Beverly - Conant St 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Reo Welding Co., Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 403006-Epsom | NH | EPS-000 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR OMNI Fireproofing Systems 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Public Works - Bureau of Street Lighting - Santa Monica Blvd Yard 170 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mulberry 170 FTE
NAT-SIZE Medallion Plastics 170 FTE
NAT-SIZE Republic Doors and Frames 170 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.