Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade · Arizona

Cassavant Assembly and Processing LLC

Phoenix, AZ · ~55 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cassavant Assembly and Processing LLC runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade A.

Cassavant Assembly and Processing LLC: 1.6 TCR = 49% of Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cassavant Assembly and Processing LLC safety composite

Cassavant Assembly and Processing LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2019→2024

Cassavant Assembly and Processing LLC injury rate improved

Cassavant Assembly and Processing LLC's TCR fell 2.7 from 4.2 in 2019 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.2 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 49% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #2/6
  • PHOTO Metal Finishing
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Metal Finishing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Cassavant Assembly and Processing LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cassavant Assembly and Processing LLC averages 1.6 TCR (49% of the Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cassavant Assembly and Processing LLC TCR series: 2019=4.2 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Cassavant Assembly and Processing LLC falls in its industry

585 Anodizing metals and metal pro establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 6 Anodizing metals and metal pro employers in Arizona.

Cassavant Assembly and Processing LLC (55 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cassavant Assembly and Processing LLC
Cassavant Assembly and Processing LLC (55 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Cassavant Assembly and Processing LLC has fewer employees than the Anodizing metals and metal products for median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 4.2 2.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · AZ · Phoenix

585 Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Metal Finishing 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hixson Metal Finishing 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Klune Spanish Fork 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aerospace Coatings International, Inc. 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE EPCOR San Tan Water, EPCOR San Tan Wastewater 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pure Energy LLC 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE LTI Contracting 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR HFLCC02 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Fives Giddings & Lewis, LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR NGI National Constructors, LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Allied Steel Corporation 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE United Enterprises, Inc 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE RSSI Roofing Company 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pyramid Paving & Contracting Co. 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Volk Transfer, Inc. 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.