Resort hotels without casinos · Minnesota
Castle Danger Limited Partnership
Two Harbors, MN · ~62 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 10.8
- Avg TCR
- 3.0
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Castle Danger Limited Partnership runs at 361% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Resort hotels without casinos workplace, earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 10.8
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.0
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 8
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Castle Danger Limited Partnership's OSHA Total Case Rate of 10.8 to the Resort hotels without casinos BLS benchmark of 3.0 (361% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Castle Danger Limited Partnership's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.0 industry benchmark.
Where Castle Danger Limited Partnership falls in its industry
11,117 Resort hotels without casinos establishmentsSafer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.
Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #183 safest of 197 Resort hotels without casinos employers in Minnesota.
Trend analysis for Castle Danger Limited Partnership
Between 2017 and 2018, Castle Danger Limited Partnership's Total Case Rate improved from 13.3 to 8.3 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 38% decrease across 1 year of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2018, at a TCR of 8.3, while 2017 saw the highest rate, at 13.3, a spread of 5.1 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 2 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, Castle Danger Limited Partnership recorded 8 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 8 injuries shown on this page for Castle Danger Limited Partnership are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 721110 - Resort hotels without casinos.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2018)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
2 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 72,405 hours worked = 5.52 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Castle Danger Limited Partnership (this establishment) | 10.82 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Hotels (except casino hotels) industry avg | 3.00 | BLS IIF, NAICS 721110 |
| Minnesota state avg (all industries) | 5.18 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Castle Danger Limited Partnership to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2018: 3 reportable incidents · 3 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2017: 5 reportable incidents · 5 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 8.3 | 5.5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 13.3 | 8.0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Castle Danger Limited Partnership's reported OSHA injury record versus its Resort hotels without casinos peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 361% of the Resort hotels without casinos benchmark, Castle Danger Limited Partnership reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Resort hotels without casinos sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Castle Danger Limited Partnership's safety grade?
How many injuries has Castle Danger Limited Partnership reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Minnesota, and by nearby establishments in Two Harbors - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~10.8)
Similar size (~62 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.