General Medical and Surgical Hospitals · California

Castro-Mission Health Center

San Francisco, CA · ~50 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Castro-Mission Health Center runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General Medical and Surgical Hospitals workplace, earning a grade A.

Castro-Mission Health Center: 1.9 TCR = 26% of General Medical and Surgical Hospitals BLS 7.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Castro-Mission Health Center safety composite

Castro-Mission Health Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Castro-Mission Health Center: 0.0 → 1.9 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 7.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2023

Castro-Mission Health Center's TCR rose 1.9 from 0.0 in 2017 to 1.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · San Francisco, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.9 · 26% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #47/662
  • PHOTO Waseca
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Waseca (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Castro-Mission Health Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Castro-Mission Health Center averages 1.9 TCR (26% of the General Medical and Surgical Hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Castro-Mission Health Center TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=7.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.9 · BLS 7.5

Where Castro-Mission Health Center falls in its industry

6,862 General Medical and Surgical H establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 662 General Medical and Surgical H employers in California.

Castro-Mission Health Center (50 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Castro-Mission Health Center
Castro-Mission Health Center (50 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Castro-Mission Health Center has fewer employees than the General Medical and Surgical Hospitals median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 7.7 5.8 3 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · CA · San Francisco

6,862 General Medical and Surgical Hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Waseca 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Midwest Cardiology-SJRMC-IN 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR S0478 BOLIVAR PHYSICIANS PRACTICES 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 42200001-422023 Grimes St Joseph Health Center 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jack Bros., Inc. 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE M Three Ranches, LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Penterman Farming Company 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trefethen Farming, LLC 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Crescent Feed Co 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Henderson County Judicial Center 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Poland 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hoople Farmers Grain Company 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Western Dairy Transport-Hyrum 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hoppe Technologies, Inc 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alexandria Hyundai 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sault Tribe Health and Human Services 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.