Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Caswell House

Yanceyville, NC · ~50 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Caswell House runs at 146% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Caswell House: 5.6 TCR = 146% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Caswell House safety composite

Caswell House scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Caswell House: 7.0 → 8.6 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 21.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.03× in 2024

Caswell House's TCR rose 1.7 from 7.0 in 2016 to 8.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 21.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.03× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Yanceyville, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 146% of ind

  • DART 5.8 DART
  • RANK #164/356
  • PHOTO Peregrine Senior Liv…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Peregrine Senior Living at Orchard Park (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Caswell House in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Caswell House averages 5.6 TCR (146% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Caswell House TCR series: 2016=7 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=21.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=8.5 · 2024=8.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Caswell House falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #164 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Caswell House (50 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Caswell House
Caswell House (50 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Caswell House has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.6 5.8 3 0 0
2023 8.5 6.3 4 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 21.8 21.8 3 5 0
2019 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2018 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 7.0 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Yanceyville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 7 employers in Yanceyville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Peregrine Senior Living at Orchard Park 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waterstone at Lexington 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Auberge at Peoria 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR THE BRISTAL ASSISTED LIVING 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Terrell and Johnny Williams 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wadesboro Hatchery / Transp 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northern Region Office (Cary) 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE WEMC - Youngsville 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Caswell County Local Government 282 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yanceyville Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brian Center Health & Rehabilitation/Yanceyville 99 FTE
CITY-NEAR 00842 - STORE # 842 YANCEYVILLE 73 FTE
NAT-TCR ITW StampTech Fasteners 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lanakila Pacific 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lynden Door Trucking 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Minnesota - Midwest Livestock Systems, LLC 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Henry Bros. Co. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE 129-DREES-HOUSTON 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Altorfer Inc. - Springfield, IL - 4949 International Parkway 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE CSI 3000 Inc 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.