Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · New York

Peregrine Senior Living at Orchard Park

Orchard Park, NY · ~46 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Peregrine Senior Living at Orchard Park runs at 146% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Peregrine Senior Living at Orchard Park: 5.6 TCR = 146% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Peregrine Senior Living at Orchard Park safety composite

Peregrine Senior Living at Orchard Park scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Peregrine Senior Living at Orchard Park: 4.7 → 9.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 9.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.73× in 2024

Peregrine Senior Living at Orchard Park's TCR rose 5.0 from 4.7 in 2020 to 9.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Orchard Park, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 146% of ind

  • DART 9.6 DART
  • RANK #122/283
  • PHOTO Waterstone at Lexing…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Waterstone at Lexington (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Peregrine Senior Living at Orchard Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Peregrine Senior Living at Orchard Park averages 5.6 TCR (146% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Peregrine Senior Living at Orchard Park TCR series: 2020=4.7 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=7.7 · 2024=9.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Peregrine Senior Living at Orchard Park falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #122 safest of 283 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New York.

Peregrine Senior Living at Orchard Park (46 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Peregrine Senior Living at Orchard Park
Peregrine Senior Living at Orchard Park (46 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Peregrine Senior Living at Orchard Park has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.6 9.6 4 0 0
2023 7.7 7.7 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.8 5.8 2 0 0
2020 4.7 4.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NY · Orchard Park

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 72 employers in Orchard Park, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Waterstone at Lexington 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caswell House 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Auberge at Peoria 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR THE BRISTAL ASSISTED LIVING 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Zuber Farms LLC 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Belltown Dairy 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE EL-VI Farms,LLC 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hudson Valley Fish Farm Inc 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Systems Orchard Park 455 FTE
CITY-NEAR MSD ORCHARD PARK 448 FTE
CITY-NEAR McGard llc 437 FTE
CITY-NEAR 10 Cobham 420 FTE
NAT-TCR 2043 - Overland Park West 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Il Brutto 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bgsu Union Nest 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilson Mill & Bakery - Est 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE River City Restoration Inc. 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Bazar Group Inc. 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nickelston Industries, Inc. 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Weiland Inc 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.