MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Mississippi

CBOC Columbus

Columbus, MS · ~20 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CBOC Columbus runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade B.

CBOC Columbus: 2.6 TCR = 69% of MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CBOC Columbus safety composite

CBOC Columbus scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

CBOC Columbus held a steady TCR band

CBOC Columbus's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=7.8 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Columbus, MS AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 69% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/26
  • PHOTO St Louis Park Float …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: St Louis Park Float Dept (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

CBOC Columbus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CBOC Columbus averages 2.6 TCR (69% of the MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CBOC Columbus TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=7.8 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.8

Where CBOC Columbus falls in its industry

2,836 MDs' (medical doctors, except establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 26 MDs' (medical doctors, except employers in Mississippi.

CBOC Columbus (20 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate CBOC Columbus
CBOC Columbus (20 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

CBOC Columbus has fewer employees than the MDs' (medical doctors, except mental hea median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 7.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · MS · Columbus

2,836 MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 104 employers in Columbus, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR St Louis Park Float Dept 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avera Medical Group Worthington 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Western Virginia Regional Jail 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wyandotte County Detention Center 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Laurel Hatchery 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Three Way Gin 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Singing River Electric Cooperative - Sand Hill Office 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE RC Construction Greenwood 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Flat Roll Group - Columbus 905 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steel Dynamics, Inc. - FR Columbus 753 FTE
CITY-NEAR Paccar Engine Company 627 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bracken Construction Company, Inc. 376 FTE
NAT-TCR Metal-Matic, Inc.- Humboldt 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Charlotte, NC Office 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Carlisle Fluid Technologies 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR CCL Label Specialty 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ridgefield Sales Office 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Collom & Carney-Eye Clinic 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sutter East Bay Medical Foundation (227-110) 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sutter Medical Foundation (185-224) 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.