General warehousing and storage · Ohio

CCA West Chester #7 (PDC)

West Chester, OH · ~117 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CCA West Chester #7 (PDC) runs at 115% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade C.

CCA West Chester #7 (PDC): 6.7 TCR = 115% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CCA West Chester #7 (PDC) safety composite

CCA West Chester #7 (PDC) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2022

CCA West Chester #7 (PDC) injury rate improved

CCA West Chester #7 (PDC)'s TCR fell 0.7 from 6.9 in 2016 to 6.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.9 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=8.4 · 2019=9.9 · 2020=4.7 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=6.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · West Chester, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 6.7 · 115% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #482/556
  • PHOTO 62051 CAPSTONE - USF…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 45 inj
  • SIZE ~117 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 62051 CAPSTONE - USF MONTGOMERY AL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

CCA West Chester #7 (PDC) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CCA West Chester #7 (PDC) averages 6.7 TCR (115% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CCA West Chester #7 (PDC) TCR series: 2016=6.9 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=8.4 · 2019=9.9 · 2020=4.7 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=6.2 · BLS 5.8

Where CCA West Chester #7 (PDC) falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #482 safest of 556 General warehousing and storag employers in Ohio.

CCA West Chester #7 (PDC) (117 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CCA West Chester #7 (PDC)
CCA West Chester #7 (PDC) (117 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

CCA West Chester #7 (PDC) has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.2 5.3 7 0 0
2021 4.3 4.3 4 1 0
2020 4.7 3.8 4 1 0
2019 9.9 8.9 9 1 0
2018 8.4 5.6 9 0 0
2017 6.1 5.1 6 0 0
2016 6.9 3.9 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · OH · West Chester

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 205 employers in West Chester, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 62051 CAPSTONE - USF MONTGOMERY AL 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR NJSWB - MAIL INNOVATIONS - BRIDGEPORT 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Foot Locker JCSC 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 102 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE EASTERN - RANDALL SHOP 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main office 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Titan Reinforcing, LLC 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE International Paper Wooster Container 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lithko Contracting, LLC 2,120 FTE
CITY-NEAR West Chester Hospital LLC 1,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cornerstone Services Group 1,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ohio DC2 939 FTE
NAT-TCR 043 Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Cleburne 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 4769-370-Pottery Barn 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Towson Univ Catering 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Environmental Servcies 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookdale PN Clinic 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5841 San Antonio TX 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4795-Aa-Slc-Salt Lake City-Slc-Trml 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Issaquah Nursing and Rehabilitation 117 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.