General Warehousing and Storage · New Jersey

Njswb - Mail Innovations - Bridgeport

Swedesboro, NJ · ~39 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Njswb - Mail Innovations - Bridgeport runs at 115% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade C.

Njswb - Mail Innovations - Bridgeport: 6.7 TCR = 115% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Njswb - Mail Innovations - Bridgeport safety composite

Njswb - Mail Innovations - Bridgeport scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−25.7

2020→2024

Njswb - Mail Innovations - Bridgeport injury rate improved

Njswb - Mail Innovations - Bridgeport's TCR fell 25.7 from 25.7 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 25.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=25.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=7.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Swedesboro, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 6.7 · 115% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #263/333
  • PHOTO 62051 CAPSTONE - USF…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 62051 CAPSTONE - USF MONTGOMERY AL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Njswb - Mail Innovations - Bridgeport in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Njswb - Mail Innovations - Bridgeport averages 6.7 TCR (115% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Njswb - Mail Innovations - Bridgeport TCR series: 2020=25.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=7.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Njswb - Mail Innovations - Bridgeport falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #263 safest of 333 General Warehousing and Storag employers in New Jersey.

Njswb - Mail Innovations - Bridgeport (39 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Njswb - Mail Innovations - Bridgeport
Njswb - Mail Innovations - Bridgeport (39 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Njswb - Mail Innovations - Bridgeport has fewer employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 7.6 7.6 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 25.7 19.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NJ · Swedesboro

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 74 employers in Swedesboro, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 62051 CAPSTONE - USF MONTGOMERY AL 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Foot Locker JCSC 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 102 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CCA West Chester #7 (PDC) 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oishii Farm Corporation 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE CLF-Stable, LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Jersey Gas-Cape May 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Jersey American Water- Delran Production 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ready Pac Foods 785 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aspire Bakeries - Swedesboro 525 FTE
CITY-NEAR NJ02 - Swedesboro Fulfillment Center 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR ARYZTA - Swedesboro 490 FTE
NAT-TCR Moear - Earth City 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Nvlve - Las Vegas South 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Agri Supply of Tifton 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR JAMESTOWN 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nycor - Cortland 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oak Ridge 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Loveland Co Sales Center 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gem City Metal Technologies 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.