Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) · North Carolina

CCL Label Charlotte

Charlotte, NC · ~182 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CCL Label Charlotte runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) workplace, earning a grade B.

CCL Label Charlotte: 2.5 TCR = 76% of Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CCL Label Charlotte safety composite

CCL Label Charlotte scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CCL Label Charlotte: 1.1 → 5.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.41× in 2024

CCL Label Charlotte's TCR rose 4.0 from 1.1 in 2016 to 5.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 76% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #52/92
  • PHOTO Taylor Print and Vis…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~182 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Taylor Print and Visual Impressions - Las Vegas NV - 0223-NVLA1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

CCL Label Charlotte in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CCL Label Charlotte averages 2.5 TCR (76% of the Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CCL Label Charlotte TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=1.7 · 2019=1.9 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=5.1 · BLS 3.3

Where CCL Label Charlotte falls in its industry

2,001 Offset printing (except books, establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 92 Offset printing (except books, employers in North Carolina.

CCL Label Charlotte (182 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate CCL Label Charlotte
CCL Label Charlotte (182 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

CCL Label Charlotte has more employees than the Offset printing (except books, printing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.1 3.5 10 0 0
2023 2.7 2.7 5 0 0
2019 1.9 1.0 4 0 0
2017 1.7 0.0 3 0 0
2016 1.1 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · NC · Charlotte

2,001 Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Taylor Print and Visual Impressions - Las Vegas NV - 0223-NVLA1 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Huston Patterson LLC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crisp Enterprises, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CCL Label 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lassonde Pappas Hendersonville 182 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Brothers 182 FTE
STATE-SIZE Walter Kidde Portable Equipment (Mebane) 182 FTE
STATE-SIZE Noble Oil Services, Inc. (Corporate) 182 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Sonesta Select Dallas Central Expressway 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Termac Corp. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Scott and Sons Electric 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Admiral Valve LLC dba CPV Manufacturing 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Good Day Farm Missouri 182 FTE
NAT-SIZE DH Pace Company Inc. dba Ankmar - Denver 182 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dynapower Company 182 FTE
NAT-SIZE Braxton County Memorial Hospital 182 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.