Forensic pathologists' offices · California

CCSF, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner

San Francisco, CA · ~43 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CCSF, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner runs at 264% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Forensic pathologists' offices workplace, earning a grade F.

CCSF, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner: 10.0 TCR = 264% of Forensic pathologists' offices BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CCSF, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner safety composite

CCSF, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−18.8

2021→2024

CCSF, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner injury rate improved

CCSF, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner's TCR fell 18.8 from 21.6 in 2021 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 21.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=21.6 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=13.1 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.0 · 264% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #353/387
  • PHOTO Lexington Clinic Bea…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lexington Clinic Beaumont (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CCSF, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CCSF, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner averages 10.0 TCR (264% of the Forensic pathologists' offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CCSF, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner TCR series: 2021=21.6 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=13.1 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 3.8

Where CCSF, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner falls in its industry

2,836 Forensic pathologists' offices establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #353 safest of 387 Forensic pathologists' offices employers in California.

CCSF, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (43 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CCSF, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner
CCSF, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (43 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

CCSF, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner has fewer employees than the Forensic pathologists' offices median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2023 13.1 7.9 5 0 0
2022 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2021 21.6 0.0 5 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · CA · San Francisco

2,836 Forensic pathologists' offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lexington Clinic Beaumont 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Texas Dermatology 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PMH Benton City Clinic/Pain Mgmt Clinic 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Family HealthCare Network - Porterville Annex 10.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Robert & Sandra Garcia Farming Partnership 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARVIN ADMINISTRATION 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donald W Beeman 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE KG Vineyard Management, LLC 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR IntegraCare Erie LLC 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DYR7 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Norstan Inc 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR WCS - New York Aquarium 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE NyproMold, Inc (Chicago) 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mid-States Glass and Metal Inc 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Windsor House 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tupelo, MS - 3406 W. Main St 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.