Landscaping services (except planning) · California

CCSF, PW, Bureau of Urban Forestry

San Francisco, CA · ~138 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CCSF, PW, Bureau of Urban Forestry runs at 346% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Landscaping services (except planning) workplace, earning a grade F.

CCSF, PW, Bureau of Urban Forestry: 15.6 TCR = 346% of Landscaping services (except planning) BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CCSF, PW, Bureau of Urban Forestry safety composite

CCSF, PW, Bureau of Urban Forestry scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 15.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CCSF, PW, Bureau of Urban Forestry: 12.1 → 17.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 17.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.03× in 2022

CCSF, PW, Bureau of Urban Forestry's TCR rose 5.8 from 12.1 in 2017 to 17.9 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.03× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 15.6 · 346% of ind

  • DART 15.9 DART
  • RANK #403/448
  • PHOTO Clackamas, OR
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 90 inj
  • SIZE ~138 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clackamas, OR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CCSF, PW, Bureau of Urban Forestry in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CCSF, PW, Bureau of Urban Forestry averages 15.6 TCR (346% of the Landscaping services (except planning) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CCSF, PW, Bureau of Urban Forestry TCR series: 2017=12.1 · 2018=16 · 2019=15.9 · 2020=17.4 · 2021=13.9 · 2022=17.9 · BLS 4.5

Where CCSF, PW, Bureau of Urban Forestry falls in its industry

2,875 Landscaping services (except p establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #403 safest of 448 Landscaping services (except p employers in California.

CCSF, PW, Bureau of Urban Forestry (138 employees, TCR 15.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CCSF, PW, Bureau of Urban Forestry
CCSF, PW, Bureau of Urban Forestry (138 employees, TCR 15.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

CCSF, PW, Bureau of Urban Forestry has more employees than the Landscaping services (except planning) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 17.9 15.9 16 2 0
2021 13.9 9.6 13 0 0
2020 17.4 15.3 16 0 0
2019 15.9 12.5 18 1 0
2018 16.0 9.3 18 1 0
2017 12.1 7.5 9 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · CA · San Francisco

2,875 Landscaping services (except planning) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clackamas, OR 15.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 155131 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glacier Landscape, Inc. 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Georgia Right of Way 15.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Westerlay Orchids LP 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Danell Custom Harvesting LLC - DCH629 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sustainable Labor Solutions, Inc 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE RLH Fire Protection 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Bend - Police Dept 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Indicom Buildings Inc. 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0034-0034-02855 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Alexandria Plant 15.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE St. Luke's Emergency and Transport Services 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Malog - Logan Airport 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4054-ABS-0027-0026-04406 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4054-ABS-0017-0016-00197 138 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.