Government base facilities operation support services · California

CCSF, Real Estate Division

San Francisco, CA · ~335 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CCSF, Real Estate Division runs at 167% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Government base facilities operation support services workplace, earning a grade D.

CCSF, Real Estate Division: 4.3 TCR = 167% of Government base facilities operation support services BLS 2.6 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CCSF, Real Estate Division safety composite

CCSF, Real Estate Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2017→2024

CCSF, Real Estate Division injury rate improved

CCSF, Real Estate Division's TCR fell 2.8 from 5.3 in 2017 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.3 · 2018=6.0 · 2019=3.0 · 2020=7.6 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561210 · San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 167% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #43/69
  • PHOTO 4238-232
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 84 inj
  • SIZE ~335 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4238-232 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CCSF, Real Estate Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CCSF, Real Estate Division averages 4.3 TCR (167% of the Government base facilities operation support services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CCSF, Real Estate Division TCR series: 2017=5.3 · 2018=6 · 2019=3 · 2020=7.6 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 2.6

Where CCSF, Real Estate Division falls in its industry

757 Government base facilities ope establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 69 Government base facilities ope employers in California.

CCSF, Real Estate Division (335 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CCSF, Real Estate Division
CCSF, Real Estate Division (335 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9

CCSF, Real Estate Division has more employees than the Government base facilities operation sup median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 2.2 6 1 0
2023 2.9 2.6 8 0 0
2022 2.6 2.3 7 0 0
2021 4.8 4.0 12 0 0
2020 7.6 6.0 14 5 0
2019 3.0 1.9 6 2 0
2018 6.0 5.0 17 2 0
2017 5.3 4.0 14 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561210 · CA · San Francisco

757 Government base facilities operation support services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4238-232 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR JAN-VA-Volvo 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bay County Juvenile Home 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4238-175 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE HN Farm Labor Services, Inc 335 FTE
STATE-SIZE Burbank Water and Power 335 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ingomar Packing Company 335 FTE
STATE-SIZE Diamond Wipes International 335 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Casa Grande Price Industries 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Berkshire Nursing Home 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Alnye LLC 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Enid 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Complete Care 335 FTE
NAT-SIZE Farmers Branch, TX 335 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trade Port 1 335 FTE
NAT-SIZE Associates in Pediatric Therapy 335 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.