Water treatment and distribution · California

Ccwa Buellton Administrative Office

Buellton, CA · ~14 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ccwa Buellton Administrative Office runs at 328% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water treatment and distribution workplace, earning a grade F.

Ccwa Buellton Administrative Office: 3.9 TCR = 328% of Water treatment and distribution BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ccwa Buellton Administrative Office safety composite

Ccwa Buellton Administrative Office scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.9

2017→2024

Ccwa Buellton Administrative Office injury rate improved

Ccwa Buellton Administrative Office's TCR fell 6.9 from 6.9 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 13.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.9 · 2018=6.9 · 2019=13.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Buellton, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.9 · 328% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #65/176
  • PHOTO UTY - West - Boise,ID
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~14 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: UTY - West - Boise,ID (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Ccwa Buellton Administrative Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ccwa Buellton Administrative Office averages 3.9 TCR (328% of the Water treatment and distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ccwa Buellton Administrative Office TCR series: 2017=6.9 · 2018=6.9 · 2019=13.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Ccwa Buellton Administrative Office falls in its industry

727 Water treatment and distributi establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #65 safest of 176 Water treatment and distributi employers in California.

Ccwa Buellton Administrative Office (14 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ccwa Buellton Administrative Office
Ccwa Buellton Administrative Office (14 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Ccwa Buellton Administrative Office has fewer employees than the Water treatment and distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 13.7 13.7 2 0 0
2018 6.9 6.9 1 0 0
2017 6.9 6.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · CA · Buellton

727 Water treatment and distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 15 employers in Buellton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR UTY - West - Boise,ID 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR County of Harnett-Harnett Regional Water 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rosemead 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sammamish Plateau Water & Sewer District 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Beckstoffer Vineyards - Mendocino 14 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shafter Wasco Investment Co., Inc. 14 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bixler 14 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hofstee Farms 14 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 153 764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coastal Vineyard Care Associates 647 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Barbara Operations 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6962-ABS-0029-0028-03324 102 FTE
NAT-TCR 19-TROUP 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Universal Seed LLC 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Senior High School 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Tier Pet Nutrition 3.9 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.