Industry profile · NAICS 221310

Water supply systems

Workplace injury rates across 836 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

836
Employers
5.2
Avg TCR
1.2
BLS benchmark
13,051
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Water supply systems average 5.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 4.4 times the BLS national benchmark of 1.2.

5.2
avg TCR · reporting employers
1.2
BLS national benchmark
836
employers reporting
13,051
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Water supply systems Safety Data Reveals

The Water supply systems sector (NAICS 221310) encompasses 836 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 13,051 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 1.2 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 5.2 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Water supply systems that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 17
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
City of Goshen - Water & Sewer Dept Goshen, IN F 29.7
Culligan Water Troy, NY F 24.6
Metro Water District Tucson, AZ F 24.5
Division of Water Dist (CON-0223) Norfolk, VA F 22.9
Culligan Water of Troy NY Troy, NY F 21.4
Water - Construction / Distribution Cedar Rapids, IA F 21.2
Underground Utilities Sioux City, IA F 19.5
Municipal Service Center - Water Thousand Oaks, CA F 18.6
M&B Environmental, Inc. Harleysville, PA F 18.1
California Water Service Group San Jose, CA F 18.1
Valley of the Moon Water District Sonoma, CA F 17.9
Griffith Landscape/Irrigation District Los Angeles, CA F 17.3
Distribution and Business Office Madison, TN F 16.8
Capitol Underground, Inc Sun Prairie, WI F 16.6
City Of Sacramento-Field Services Division Roll-Up (140014) Sacramento, CA F 16.5
City Yards Centralia, IL F 16.4
Water & Sewer Department Clinton Township, MI F 16.3
Essex Operations and Control Arcata, CA F 16.0
Gurnee Public Works Department Gurnee, IL F 15.9
North Unit Irrigation District Madras, OR F 15.9
Public Utilities, Sewer, Engineering, Water Treatment Plants Joliet, IL F 15.6
Public Works- Water & Sewer Dept. Elk Grove Village, IL F 15.6
Nob Hill Water Association Yakima, WA F 15.2
Roberts Irrigation Co Plover, WI F 14.9
Middletown Water Department Middletown, CT F 14.9
Deschutes Valley Water District Madras, OR F 14.8
Rio Rancho - OMI Rio Rancho, NM F 14.7
Water Pollution Control Facility Harwinton, CT F 14.6
City of Salem Public Works Salem, IL F 14.6
Otter Lake Water Commission Virden, IL F 14.5
Fresno Water Division Fresno, CA F 14.4
Connersville Utilities Connersville, IN F 14.3
Kern County Water Agency Bakersfield, CA F 13.9
Village of Winnetka Water & Electric Department Winnetka, IL F 13.8
city of Middletown - Sewer Department Middletown, CT F 13.7
Beaumont-Cherry Valley Water District Beaumont, CA F 13.3
Monte Vista Water District Montclair, CA F 13.3
W/W Line Crews Bowling Green, KY F 13.2
City of Graham Graham, NC F 13.2
Hixson Utility District Hixson, TN F 13.0
Lake Arrowhead Community Services District Blue Jay, CA F 12.9
City of Goshen Water & Sewer Goshen, IN F 12.8
City of Saginaw Water Treatment Plant Saginaw, MI F 12.8
Iowa Lakes Regional Water Spencer, IA F 12.7
Office Edinburg, TX F 12.7
Bennett & Bennett, Inc. (Lemoore) Lemoore, CA F 12.6
City of Kalamazoo-Public Services- Stockbridge Kalamazoo, MI F 12.4
Panoche Water District Firebaugh, CA F 12.4
City of Asheville Water Department Asheville, NC F 12.4
Three Valleys Municipal Water District Claremont, CA F 12.3
Page 1 of 17 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Water supply systems?

This sector averages 5.2 against a BLS benchmark of 1.2 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.