Construction management, commercial and institutional building · Wisconsin

CD Smith Construction - UW Madison Vet Med

Madison, WI · ~20 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CD Smith Construction - UW Madison Vet Med runs at 98% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Construction management, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade C.

CD Smith Construction - UW Madison Vet Med: 2.8 TCR = 98% of Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CD Smith Construction - UW Madison Vet Med safety composite

CD Smith Construction - UW Madison Vet Med scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CD Smith Construction - UW Madison Vet Med: 0.0 → 8.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 8.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

CD Smith Construction - UW Madison Vet Med's TCR rose 8.5 from 0.0 in 2022 to 8.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Madison, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 98% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #48/149
  • PHOTO Rice Companies Inc.
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rice Companies Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

CD Smith Construction - UW Madison Vet Med in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CD Smith Construction - UW Madison Vet Med averages 2.8 TCR (98% of the Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CD Smith Construction - UW Madison Vet Med TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=8.5 · BLS 2.9

Where CD Smith Construction - UW Madison Vet Med falls in its industry

4,692 Construction management, comme establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #48 safest of 149 Construction management, comme employers in Wisconsin.

CD Smith Construction - UW Madison Vet Med (20 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate CD Smith Construction - UW Madison Vet Med
CD Smith Construction - UW Madison Vet Med (20 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

CD Smith Construction - UW Madison Vet Med has fewer employees than the Construction management, commercial and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.5 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · WI · Madison

4,692 Construction management, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 577 employers in Madison, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rice Companies Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR E. F. Brett & Company Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR VMC Group - Houston 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Diversified Construction 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Alsum Farms Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE FGI West Salem 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE 760 Durand Agronomy 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE 764 Osseo Agronomy 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital - Madison 2,401 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meriter Hospital 2,249 FTE
CITY-NEAR EatStreet 1,659 FTE
CITY-NEAR TDS - Junction Road (All Employees) 1,302 FTE
NAT-TCR Diamond Pacific - Auburn 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Lincoln Lumber Company, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Main Electric Supply Company LLC - Fairfield, CA 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Shipfusion-Carol Stream 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amistad Ranches 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norco Metal Finishing, Inc. 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE RT Nelson Co Inc 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Staybridge Suites Stow 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.