Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Minnesota

Cedar Crest of Silver Lake

Silver Lake, MN · ~44 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cedar Crest of Silver Lake runs at 147% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Cedar Crest of Silver Lake: 5.6 TCR = 147% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cedar Crest of Silver Lake safety composite

Cedar Crest of Silver Lake scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cedar Crest of Silver Lake: 3.9 → 7.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 7.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Cedar Crest of Silver Lake's TCR rose 3.4 from 3.9 in 2017 to 7.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Silver Lake, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 147% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #78/226
  • PHOTO LEGACY VILLAGE OF CA…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LEGACY VILLAGE OF CASTLE PINES (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Cedar Crest of Silver Lake in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cedar Crest of Silver Lake averages 5.6 TCR (147% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cedar Crest of Silver Lake TCR series: 2017=3.9 · 2024=7.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Cedar Crest of Silver Lake falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #78 safest of 226 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Cedar Crest of Silver Lake (44 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cedar Crest of Silver Lake
Cedar Crest of Silver Lake (44 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Cedar Crest of Silver Lake has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.3 0.0 2 0 0
2017 3.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MN · Silver Lake

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 3 employers in Silver Lake, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LEGACY VILLAGE OF CASTLE PINES 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smith Center 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Fountains at Lake Pointe Woods 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Berkeley Square Retirement 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE West River 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monticello Training Ctr-LL 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water Treatment Facility 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE WasteWater Treatment Facility 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Silver Lake 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeside Elementary 57 FTE
NAT-TCR Bean Plant 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Harbor Bay 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bemus Landscape Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilty's Electric-California, INC 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Service Supply of Victoria 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gresham 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smith Construction, Inc. 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nob Hill 604-Los Gatos 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.