Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · New York

Smith Center

Guilderland, NY · ~76 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Smith Center runs at 147% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Smith Center: 5.6 TCR = 147% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Smith Center safety composite

Smith Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.1

2016→2023

Smith Center injury rate improved

Smith Center's TCR fell 15.1 from 15.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 15.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.1 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=8.8 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Guilderland, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 147% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #36/98
  • PHOTO LEGACY VILLAGE OF CA…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~76 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LEGACY VILLAGE OF CASTLE PINES (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Smith Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Smith Center averages 5.6 TCR (147% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Smith Center TCR series: 2016=15.1 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=8.8 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=3 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Smith Center falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 98 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New York.

Smith Center (76 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Smith Center
Smith Center (76 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Smith Center has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2020 4.5 4.5 2 0 0
2019 6.8 6.8 4 0 0
2018 8.8 7.0 5 0 0
2017 6.3 6.3 4 0 0
2016 15.1 15.1 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NY · Guilderland

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 22 employers in Guilderland, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LEGACY VILLAGE OF CASTLE PINES 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedar Crest of Silver Lake 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Fountains at Lake Pointe Woods 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Berkeley Square Retirement 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Brightfarms Inc. 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE POTSDAM SERVICE CENTER-NY99 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bennett Contracting Inc 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3841_7298 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Peter's Health Partner/ St. Peter's Community Hospice 354 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Perer's Health Partners/Our Lady of Mercy Life Center 282 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08393 - Store # 8393 Guilderland 209 FTE
CITY-NEAR LIFE-2 MercyCare Lane-SPHP-NY 200 FTE
NAT-TCR Neumann Plumbing and Heating, Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Boston Whaler - Flagler 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Montgomery Senior Living 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Northwestern Medicine Central Dupage Hospital 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 10398 Montana Avenue (WO) 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Conley 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Joe-Anne Burgin Health and Rehabilitation 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE PF HPM SNF Ops, LLC 76 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.