Building cleaning services, janitorial · Iowa

Cedar Rapids Janitorial

Cedar Rapids, IA · ~72 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cedar Rapids Janitorial runs at 8% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade A.

Cedar Rapids Janitorial: 0.4 TCR = 8% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cedar Rapids Janitorial safety composite

Cedar Rapids Janitorial scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Cedar Rapids Janitorial held a steady TCR band

Cedar Rapids Janitorial's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=1.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Cedar Rapids, IA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 8% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/80
  • PHOTO QSI Mount Olive RTE
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: QSI Mount Olive RTE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

Cedar Rapids Janitorial in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cedar Rapids Janitorial averages 0.4 TCR (8% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cedar Rapids Janitorial TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=1.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Cedar Rapids Janitorial falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 80 Building cleaning services, ja employers in Iowa.

Cedar Rapids Janitorial (72 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cedar Rapids Janitorial
Cedar Rapids Janitorial (72 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Cedar Rapids Janitorial has more employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2017 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · IA · Cedar Rapids

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 466 employers in Cedar Rapids, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR QSI Mount Olive RTE 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Roche Diagnostics 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belmont Arthur Ave LDC 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT METHODIST MEDOAK RIDGE HSKP 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Des Moines Two Rivers Gas 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Denco Highway Construction Corporation 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forrest & Associate, Inc. 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE CKF Des Moines 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockwell Collins (Cedar Rapids IA 400 NE) 6,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockwell Collins - Cedar Rapids C Ave 6,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR CRST EXPEDITED INC 3,475 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Methodist Hospital 2,949 FTE
NAT-TCR Oklahoma City Office 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Tomahawk Operations - Somo Facility 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Petosky CBO/Center 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Wurtland 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE IE2 Construction, Inc. 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Halron - Green Bay 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE French Broad Electric Membership Corporation - Headquarters 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Division 23 - North Carolina ABC 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.