Motorcycles and parts manufacturing · Wisconsin

Tomahawk Operations - Somo Facility

Tomahawk, WI · ~255 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tomahawk Operations - Somo Facility runs at 11% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Motorcycles and parts manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Tomahawk Operations - Somo Facility: 0.4 TCR = 11% of Motorcycles and parts manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tomahawk Operations - Somo Facility safety composite

Tomahawk Operations - Somo Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2024

Tomahawk Operations - Somo Facility injury rate improved

Tomahawk Operations - Somo Facility's TCR fell 0.9 from 0.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.9 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=0.3 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336991 · Tomahawk, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 11% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO SRAM - Chicago HQ
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~255 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SRAM - Chicago HQ (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Tomahawk Operations - Somo Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tomahawk Operations - Somo Facility averages 0.4 TCR (11% of the Motorcycles and parts manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tomahawk Operations - Somo Facility TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=0.3 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Tomahawk Operations - Somo Facility falls in its industry

49 Motorcycles and parts manufact establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Motorcycles and parts manufact employers in Wisconsin.

Tomahawk Operations - Somo Facility (255 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Tomahawk Operations - Somo Facility
Tomahawk Operations - Somo Facility (255 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Tomahawk Operations - Somo Facility has more employees than the Motorcycles and parts manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.3 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2018 0.3 0.0 0 1 0
2017 1.2 1.2 3 0 0
2016 0.9 0.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336991 · WI · Tomahawk

49 Motorcycles and parts manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 18 employers in Tomahawk, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SRAM - Chicago HQ 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Newman Technology South Carolina, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quarq 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Powertrain Operations: Pilgrim Road 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Michels Trenchless, Inc-WI-Lomira 255 FTE
STATE-SIZE IES Commercial, Inc - NEXT Electric 255 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plover Appetizers 255 FTE
STATE-SIZE Madison Kipp Corporation South Plant/Corporate 255 FTE
CITY-NEAR TOMAHAWK, WI 434 FTE
CITY-NEAR Louisiana-Pacific Tomahawk 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tomahawk Operations - Kaphaem Facility 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aspirus Tomahawk Hospital 95 FTE
NAT-TCR Oklahoma City Office 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Petosky CBO/Center 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Wurtland 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cedar Rapids Janitorial 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Lewis Bear Company 255 FTE
NAT-SIZE Entire Company 255 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Dairy Transport-Stephenville 255 FTE
NAT-SIZE Landstar - Rockford 255 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.