Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Utah

Cedarwood at Sandy

Sandy, UT · ~100 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cedarwood at Sandy runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Cedarwood at Sandy: 4.3 TCR = 113% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cedarwood at Sandy safety composite

Cedarwood at Sandy scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2016→2024

Cedarwood at Sandy injury rate improved

Cedarwood at Sandy's TCR fell 3.3 from 4.7 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.7 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=7.7 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Sandy, UT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.3 · 113% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/44
  • PHOTO The Meridian at Boca…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Meridian at Boca Raton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Cedarwood at Sandy in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cedarwood at Sandy averages 4.3 TCR (113% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cedarwood at Sandy TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=7.7 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Cedarwood at Sandy falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 44 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Utah.

Cedarwood at Sandy (100 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cedarwood at Sandy
Cedarwood at Sandy (100 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Cedarwood at Sandy has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2023 7.7 3.1 5 0 0
2022 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2021 4.8 0.0 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 8.4 2.8 6 0 0
2018 5.8 5.8 4 0 0
2016 4.7 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · UT · Sandy

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 96 employers in Sandy, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Meridian at Boca Raton 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gardens of Rose Hill 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SPRING ARBOR OF OUTER BANKS 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Golden Oaks 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE CEDAR CITY 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Winward Electrical Services INC 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bullett Electric 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE FedEx 985 W KERSHAW ST 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR BD Medical Systems 1,334 FTE
CITY-NEAR BD Medical Sandy 1,303 FTE
CITY-NEAR Layton Construction Company, LLC 1,143 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mountain America Exposition Center 861 FTE
NAT-TCR BWAY Fontana 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 1244 Val56 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Lunenburg Correctional Center 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR D&S Electrical Technologies LLC 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Central Transport - 463 463SH 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avon Place 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Austin Tx - 822 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oklahoma City Ok - 825 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.