Polystyrene foam product manufacturing · Virginia

Cellofoam-Fredericksburg, VA

Fredericksburg, VA · ~47 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cellofoam-Fredericksburg, VA runs at 132% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Polystyrene foam product manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Cellofoam-Fredericksburg, VA: 4.4 TCR = 132% of Polystyrene foam product manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cellofoam-Fredericksburg, VA safety composite

Cellofoam-Fredericksburg, VA scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.2

2016→2023

Cellofoam-Fredericksburg, VA injury rate improved

Cellofoam-Fredericksburg, VA's TCR fell 5.2 from 5.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 13.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.2 · 2017=13.8 · 2018=7.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326140 · Fredericksburg, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 132% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/9
  • PHOTO FloraCraft Corporati…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FloraCraft Corporation Headquarters (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Cellofoam-Fredericksburg, VA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cellofoam-Fredericksburg, VA averages 4.4 TCR (132% of the Polystyrene foam product manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cellofoam-Fredericksburg, VA TCR series: 2016=5.2 · 2017=13.8 · 2018=7.2 · 2019=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Cellofoam-Fredericksburg, VA falls in its industry

260 Polystyrene foam product manuf establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 9 Polystyrene foam product manuf employers in Virginia.

Cellofoam-Fredericksburg, VA (47 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cellofoam-Fredericksburg, VA
Cellofoam-Fredericksburg, VA (47 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Cellofoam-Fredericksburg, VA has fewer employees than the Polystyrene foam product manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 7.2 5.7 5 0 0
2017 13.8 9.8 7 0 0
2016 5.2 5.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326140 · VA · Fredericksburg

260 Polystyrene foam product manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 279 employers in Fredericksburg, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FloraCraft Corporation Headquarters 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dart Container Lodi 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Industries - Bentonville 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SSF Productions LLC 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE BATH CO PW ST 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE RCL 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heritage Contracting LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE TRINITY Group Construction 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR SPOTSYLVANIA COUNTY SCHOOLS 2,863 FTE
CITY-NEAR MARY WASHINGTON HOSPITAL 1,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR GERMANNA COMMUNITY COLLEGE 865 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brookdale Fredericksburg 848 FTE
NAT-TCR Cabkco-Aeg-Bakersfield Columbus 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Glen at St. Joseph 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Compassus - Neenah 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Clearwater Clearence - #904 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Odyssey Assisted Living at Montevue 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE QSI Marshville 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gordon Milk Transport 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Transport - 070 & 070SH 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.